News & Views

New rules protect Canadians from cosmetic harm

“Consumers especially concerned about lung health may want to avoid spray products listing PHMB even before the rules are finalized.”

Photographer: Clearcut Derby

The moment we select a product designed to enhance our beauty, or care for our body, we are making a choice rooted in trust. What happens when that trust is broken, when the promise of “Beautifully You” is undercut by a stark, silent label warning of “Cancer and Reproductive Harm?” The uncomfortable truth of toxic ingredients lurking in personal care items is particularly relevant when examining products that are staples in the routines of Black and racialized communities.

The revelation that certain chemicals, linked to severe health risks, are widely present in hair products across Canada presents a profound matter of environmental justice, demanding swift regulatory action.

Fortunately, Health Canada is now addressing this dangerous gap by proposing to tighten the rules on several cosmetic ingredients featured on the Cosmetic Ingredient Hotlist. This federal tool is critical because it signals which substances are banned or limited in Canadian cosmetics to prevent injury to users, even before specific incidents occur. The proposed changes target ingredients known to cause cancer, lung damage, liver toxicity, and severe skin reactions.

For many consumers, the most significant proposed shift affects hair colorants and care products. Health Canada is focusing new restrictions on two intense colourants: Basic Violet 4 (CI 42600) and Basic Blue 7 (CI 42595). Updated exposure data suggests that repeated contact with these dyes at higher levels carries a potential cancer risk. If these proposals are adopted, these dyes would be completely banned from any “leave-on” hair product, such as tinted hair creams that remain on the scalp. In rinse-off items like purple or blue “toning” shampoos, conditioners, or masks marketed for blonde, or grey hair, their usage would be tightly capped. Consumers must actively scan ingredient lists for these specific dye names or color index numbers, as their presence in leave-on products would no longer be permitted.

Equally concerning are the risks associated with inhalation. The proposal includes a stringent crackdown on Polyaminopropyl biguanide (PHMB), a common preservative. Due to concerns that inhaled droplets can severely harm lung function, PHMB would be entirely banned from spray, or aerosol cosmetics. This includes products like facial mists, makeup setting sprays, aerosol hair products, or deodorant sprays.

For those with compromised lung health, such as people with asthma, or chronic respiratory conditions, avoiding spray products listing PHMB is prudent even before the new rules become finalized. While non-spray products (like moisturizers, or cleansing gels) may still contain PHMB, it would be limited to a very low cap (up to 0.2%) due to the risk of skin sensitization.

The scope of the proposed restrictions extends beyond synthetic chemicals, calling into question the safety of products often marketed as “natural.” The proposal takes a tougher stance on comfrey (Symphytum), removing an exception for one species after new evidence showed the plant can contain pyrrolizidine alkaloids linked to liver toxicity and potential carcinogenicity.

This impacts “herbal” or “natural” creams and balms, as well as DIY-style artisanal cosmetics that use comfrey extracts. Similarly, furocoumarins (including psoralen), which are light-reactive chemicals that can cause serious skin burns and raise cancer risk when exposed to UVA light, are being restricted. These substances, often naturally present in extracts from citrus, fig, or celery family plants, are proposed to be forbidden as intentionally added ingredients in cosmetics. For readers using concentrated “natural” oils, or leave-on treatments during the daytime, extra caution regarding ingredients that mix heavy plant extracts and sun exposure is necessary.

These changes, which are open for public comment until February 17th, 2026, are designed to drive reformulation and force the removal of non-compliant products. They serve as a clear signal to manufacturers and retailers that consumer safety must be prioritized over profit, particularly when dealing with ingredients that carry high acute toxicity, such as the newly prohibited Brucine. This critical regulatory shift is an act of preventative care, pushing back against the systemic use of harmful ingredients in consumer goods. It requires every consumer to become an active guardian of their own health by scrutinizing labels and questioning what they apply to their skin and hair.

Protecting the community starts with information and vigilance, transforming the act of reading a product label into a vital act of self-advocacy. This comprehensive approach to safety ensures that the journey toward wellness and empowerment is not undermined by hidden risks. The proposed standards act like a powerful filter, forcing toxic substances out of the beauty supply chain and offering a clearer, safer path toward true self-care.

Trending

Exit mobile version