The concept of the ‘Precautionary Principle,’ and the lack of it by the Canadian Government

BY SIMONE J. SMITH

It truly blows my mind at the utter disregard for the health of Canadian citizens by the Canadian government.

I know that for some of our readers, they depend on the government to do what needs to be done to keep them safe, but unfortunately, this is not always the case. There have been numerous reports of global governments taking care of their own selfish needs, and watching their people suffer in the process.

They continue to say that we are all in this together, but for some strange reason, science continues to develop on the severe effects that the vaccine has had on the world population.

Where to begin?

Let’s just take it back a little and speak on some of the neurological issues that are common side effects of all childhood vaccines and are often grouped under the label of “autism.” For years, scientists have been finding correlation with increased vaccinations of children to rising rates of autism in the United States. What is disturbing is the fact that health agencies refuse to acknowledge any causal effect between the bloated childhood vaccine schedule and diagnoses of autism.

Most recently, it was reported that Moderna and the EMA have systematically neglected evidence from preclinical animal trials that clearly pointed to grave dangers of adverse events; as a result of that, the Moderna vaccine has caused thousands of deaths within less than a year of its introduction.

Something else that might be a little triggering for readers is the reports of brain damage in children following COVID-19 vaccines compared to the rate of brain damage reported with all other vaccines administered for the previous 30 years before the roll-out of the COVID-19 vaccinations.

In one report, researchers utilized the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System) for all cases reporting “encephalopathy” following vaccination.

“Encephalopathy” is a term for “Any diffuse disease of the brain that alters brain function or structure.”

What they found were results from 17 months of COVID-19 vaccine distribution since December of 2020, when the vaccines were given emergency use authorization. They also looked at the previous 30 years (360 months) before the COVID-19 vaccines started. There were 1,068 cases of “encephalopathy” reported after use of all other FDA-approved vaccines. They note that there was an increase of over 2000% cases of encephalopathy.

Experienced physicians have collaborated on establishing effective treatment guidelines for clinically manifested COVID-19. These treatment options were available both for the early stage of the disease, when emphasis is placed on inhibiting viral replication, and for the later stage, at which anti-inflammatory treatment is paramount.

Since the very beginning of the pandemic, two drugs have been used successfully at the early stage: hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. Both drugs have been, and continue to be, in use against a variety of other diseases. What is interesting is that our world governments were aware of these medicines, and still pushed an experimental vaccine on us.

This brings me to the concept of the ‘Precautionary Principle’ (Vorsorgeprinzip). It first arose in the 1970s, when Germany introduced laws as an environmental response to forest degradation and sea pollution. Vorsorgeprinzip translates as the ‘foresight principle’.

There are two ideas underpin the precautionary principle:

• Decision‐makers should anticipate harm before it occurs [with an implicit reversal of the onus of proof: under the precautionary principle someone proposing an activity should show the proposed activity will not or is very unlikely to cause significant harm
• The concept of proportionality of the risk, cost and feasibility of any proposed action

Now, there are critics of the precautionary principle in public health who warn that it may inhibit innovation; advocates say that may be wise.

Regardless of how and where you stand in this vaccination debate, research coming out shows that our world governments have done more harm to their people than good, and at some point, we have to wake up and realize that, “We are not in this together!”