There is no true measure of the levels of safety and effectiveness of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination; Introducing The Control Group

BY SIMONE J. SMITH

“Trust the Science!

Trust the Science!”

If I had a dollar for the amount of times I have heard this statement spewed from the lips of our government officials, well, I would be able to afford these gas prices.

Seriously though, mainstream and social media platforms have been ignoring, attacking and de-platforming the hundreds of international doctors and scientists who have raised serious concerns about the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Regardless of where you stand on this issue, we all know that it was rushed out under emergency use authorization, using novel technology without any long-term testing.

I want to take the time to reiterate that the SARS-CoV-2 inoculations are an untried and untested MRNA technology, which we have never before seen used in humans. There have been no long-term safety trials completed yet for these injections and therefore it would be true to say that they are experimental.

We all have friends and family members who have received these SARS-CoV-2 inoculations, and there are concerned citizens across the globe that have decided not to participate in the recent inoculation experiment. They have come together to positively contribute their data to a very important part of any experiment: the control group.

Let’s take a look at what makes up a true research experiment. In research of any kind it is vital to have both an experimental group and a control group. The experimental group receives the treatment (SARS CoV-2 vaccines in this case), and the control group does not receive the treatment.

The reason for this is so that the researchers can determine if the treatment has an impact on the measure of experiment (in this case, the reduction in serious infection as well as the incidence of adverse reactions in those given the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine). What the control group does is serve as a baseline comparison to the experimental group, whereby the researchers can reliably compare the measured results of the treatment cohort with the control.

Failure to provide a strong control group may cause a study to be considered invalid, because it would not allow the researchers to eliminate or attribute effects that might have occurred within the experimental group as being due to the treatments or incidental occurrence.

The people originally allocated by the pharmaceutical companies to be part of a control group for the SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, have almost all been vaccinated now. What this means is that the official, long- term control group for the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine research no longer exists.

Thankfully, there is a citizen led initiative, open to anyone who has chosen not to be vaccinated. The Control Group (https://www.vaxcontrolgroup.com/) is an independent, worldwide, long-term study of the health outcomes of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-free individuals. They believe that without a vaccine-free control group to compare against, there is no true measure of the levels of safety and effectiveness proclaimed by governments and health organizations across the world. Their goal is to collect large-scale health data from both the SARS-CoV-2 inoculated and the vaccine-free in order to conduct true experiments that will yield valid and reliable results.

They are voluntarily supported by: scientists, doctors and other professionals from all over the world who have helped this project to achieve the growth and success it has to date.

They continue to collect the long-term health data of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-free from every country, so that they can provide the missing control group to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccinated; thus enabling independent and transparent, comparative analysis of the mass vaccination policy.

I am thankful to this group for providing support to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-free community against discrimination and harm.