Western Christian Democracy ―Why the incongruity? Part 3

BY ERROL A. GIBBS

Democracy demands a standard of unprecedented “moral” considerations for people of a different race, culture, colour, and religion. The context here is that the “keepers of democracy” decide for all humanity. Democracy also demands noble goals aligned with Christian democratic ideals, underpinned by a “moral and ethical” foundation of “just” laws to ensure fairness and justice for all.

The disparity in health, wealth, ownership, and corporate directorships among peoples and countries of colour, and the elites in Western Christian Democracies,” shatters the notion that nations practice, seeks to achieve, or pursue democracy with great vigour. The rigid “power imbalance” sustained and maintained by “unjust laws” is clear and convincing evidence that Christian democracy has entrenched limits.

Democracy represents the best opportunity for nations to achieve harmonious and equitable societies. Nevertheless, to millions worldwide, democracy “falls short” of its noble ideals. To others, democracy is a “double-edged” sword, because of two opposing ideological “worldviews” (“capitalism” and “socialism”). These two ideological political positions also undergird the narratives of the two major parties that divide peoples and countries.

Historians recorded democracy back to classical Athens and Greeks in the 16th century BC Postmodern democracy projects a bastion of freedoms of expression, good governance, and peace organizations, and “fairness and justice” for all, as the “ideals of democracy.” In his Gettysburg address in Pennsylvania on November 19^th, 1863, Abraham Lincoln (1809-1865), the 16^th president of the United States of America said, “…this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom, and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.”

In the Declaration of Independence in Congress, July 4^th, 1776, Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), the 3^rd president of the United States of America said, “We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” These two critical statements are the bedrock of American democracy, and they have helped establish a beacon of “high ideals,” hopefully, for non-democratic nations to emulate.

“To say the least, the experiences of the Greeks and Romans showed how not to do it [solve the problem of constitutional government]…the political structure of the United States is radically different from that of the Greeks or the Romans. It is based upon the Ten Commandments and on the teachings of Christ. Try to rewrite the Declaration of Independence without reference to the Christ axioms. You’ll find it can’t be done!” The Mainspring of Human Progress. Copyright © 1947. Chapter 9: Compromise ― the Romans, p. 91. Henry G. Weaver (1889-1947).

Fortunately, human beings have the patronage of “Spiritual Intelligence” (SQ) (God), “Human Intelligence” (IQ) (Human), and “Artificial Intelligence” (AI) (Machine) to engender better societies. These three levels of intelligence ought to be in concord, to achieve the highest human potential and capability to survive as a viable species. Philosophically speaking, this writer refers to these three enablers as the “Triad Colossi” ―the ultimate path to making a true democracy.

Herein lies the heart of this writers’ inquiry. Democracy — Why the Incongruity? Some of the wealthiest people on earth are Ministers of the Gospel. How does such a contradiction square with the ideals of “Christianity” or “democracy?” In the realm of political systems, democracy stands supreme. Constitutions and national anthems proclaim the name of God as “supreme.” “In God, we trust.” Yet, there is a “gulf of separation” between “professing” and “practicing” Christianity. There are practicing Christians in Western societies, but to declare that Western nations are Christian nations is a misnomer.

A Christian nation “must,” profess Christianity at the highest electoral office, and its constitution “must,” proclaim the teachings of Jesus Christ (its founder), as the central message, to guide its affairs ―public or private. “Separation of Church and State” is another idea that many in the Christian world have adopted, though it only works to benefit the secular world. Paradoxically, the concept is contrary to the ideals of “Christianity” and “democracy.” It is counterintuitive, counterproductive, illogical, and implausible.

It denies the state of a crucial path, “spiritual” and “constitutional,” by which the country could benefit from the “moral and sanctifying power” of the church. It is an unwise proposition. Furthermore, the concept is neither Biblical, constitutional, nor politically expedient. It is categorical, a grievance against God, and the survival of humankind as a viable species, giving rise to chaos. Hence, the scriptures proclaim the destruction of earthly kingdoms and human rule (Daniel 2:44).

Where are our postmodern priests, philosophers, and early Christian reformers akin to John Huss (1369 – 1415)? Where are the philosophers, the intellectuals, and the Biblical scholar’s voices when the world cries out for social justice and just laws? The year 2020 sounds like a prophetic year, but this writer hopes that the postmodern prophets would think long and hard before they advise us mere mortals about what would unfold in the future ― civilizations quest since 1st century BCE. 1.