Community News
ZERO POWER – With the Implementation of the Zero Draft, the threat of a centralized government is now more dangerous than ever!
BY SIMONE J. SMITH
Since the COVID outbreak, we’ve seen over and over again how governments and corporations around the world have used the pandemic as an excuse to limit free speech, expand surveillance, and further erode civil liberties.
This is not a conspiracy theory; this has actually occurred. Let’s be clear about this.
In an article titled, “WHO’S IN CHARGE AND WHY? CENTRALISATION WITHIN AND BETWEEN GOVERNMENTS, (2020)” it speaks to the fact that public health planners have long argued for a “command and control” approach to pandemics.
Governments almost universally adopted that approach early in the pandemic. The result was that for a few months in 2020, politics looked very different in many countries, and many of us felt that here in Canada. Policymaking became far more centralized and hierarchical than usual, with less regional and ministerial autonomy and more empowered heads of government.
There were two different kinds of centralization visible in the pandemic. One was within governments. In this case, the head of a government – any government, from a town hall to a country – gathered together the power normally dispersed across different ministries, politicians, and agencies.
The other was between governments. In this case, power that is normally in the hands of one government, such as a local government, or regional governments such as Italian or Spanish regions or the states of Austria or Germany, shifted to the central government.
They have given us the illusion that things are going back to normal, but trust me when I say, we have seen the beginning of what is to come. The threat of a centralized government is now more dangerous than ever!
The United Nations World Health Organization’s (WHO) latest move is to seize new far-reaching and legally binding powers to supposedly “improve the so-called prevention, preparedness and response” of future pandemics.
In a recent WHO meeting in February 2023, a working group of WHO representatives completed their reading of the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations, and agreed on the next steps for more in-depth negotiations to approve a new “Pandemic Treaty,” which has been titled, “Zero Draft.”
According to the WHO, the proposal for an international instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response is guided by a spirit of collective solidarity, anchored in the principles of fairness, inclusiveness and transparency.
Neither individual governments nor the global community can entirely prevent pandemics, but they believe that the international community needs to be much better prepared and better aligned in responding to possible future pandemics across the entire cycle of detection, alarm and response.
They believe that an agreement would set out the objectives and fundamental principles in order to structure the necessary collective action to fight pandemics.
An international convention, agreement, or other international instrument on pandemics would support and focus on:
- Early detection and prevention of pandemics
- Resilience to future pandemics
- Response to any future pandemics, in particular by ensuring universal and equitable access to medical solutions, such as vaccines, medicines and diagnostics
- A stronger international health framework with the WHO as the coordinating authority on global health matters
- The “One Health” approach, connecting the health of humans, animals and our planet
More specifically, such an agreement/instrument can enhance international cooperation in a number of priority areas, such as surveillance, alerts and response, but also in general trust in the international health system.
Oh, really now! We are supposed to put our faith in an international health system that forced, coerced, and intimidated millions of people to take a vaccination that has proven to be even more fatal than the disease itself. Let’s see what else they have to say.
Implementing the lessons from COVID-19, including through a new international health instrument, and recovering gains on immunization, communicable and non-communicable diseases were some of the key topics discussed at the 152nd World Health Organization (WHO) Executive Board, which took place on January 30th – February 7th, 2023.
The Director of the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), Jarbas Barbosa, participated in the discussions following his appointment as WHO Regional Director for the Americas. He also met representatives from Latin America and Caribbean countries to discuss priority issues, including stronger participation of countries of the region in the intergovernmental negotiating body (INB) for the pandemic treaty, set to be tabled for approval of Member States at the World Health Assembly in 2024.
On March 3rd, 2022, the Council adopted a decision to authorize the opening of negotiations for an international agreement on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.
A convention, agreement or other international instrument is legally binding under international law. An agreement on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response adopted under the World Health Organization (WHO) would enable countries around the globe to strengthen national, regional and global capacities and resilience to future pandemics.
Their claim is that the instrument would also:
- Ensure higher, sustained and long-term political engagement at the level of world leaders of states or governments
- Define clear processes and tasks
- Enhance long-term public and private-sector support at all levels
- Foster integration of health matters across all relevant policy areas
The latest meeting was held on April 17th – 20th, 2023.
We need to act NOW before this gets way out of hand.
If we’ve learned anything from the pandemic, it is precisely that It was thanks to a diversified approach and NOT global governance that the world was able to verify and withdraw from effective and ineffective instruments of health policy.
But Governments and Globalist leaders realized how powerful it is to control our freedoms just by pressing a single button.
If we don’t stop them now and abort the “Pandemic Treaty,” the UN’s World Health Organization will increase its powers to:
- Declare “potential” health emergencies
- Develop new global surveillance and data-sharing mechanisms
- Gain powers to counter “misinformation and disinformation,” which means to declare a global “official truth”
- Build capabilities to detect and report potential public health emergencies worldwide
- Respond swiftly to a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC) whenever it’s declared by the WHO
That is the current status of the “Pandemic Treaty” draft. The amendments by the United States and the European Union have been included. Unless we act quickly, a legally binding act of international law for so-called pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response will be in force.
Why is this so dangerous?
The binding right to establish one – common for the whole world – strategy to fight future epidemics would, by definition, take global command, both during and outside of a pandemic (since the document defines coordination powers also outside the pandemic period), eroding the sovereignty of Canada and any other country.
Naturally, they worded certain sections of agreement to ensure the pacification of the nations. For example, they state that sovereignty is defined as one of its guiding principles and rights.
“States have, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations and the principles of international law, the sovereign right to determine and manage their approach to public health, notably pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems, pursuant to their own policies and legislation, provided that activities within their jurisdiction or control do not cause damage to their peoples and other countries. Sovereignty also covers the rights of States over their biological resources,” (Article 4 of the Zero Draft).
The preliminary draft also states that members “shall establish” a global compensation mechanism for injuries resulting from vaccines.
Oh, so is this an admission that these so-called vaccines are causing harm. If not, why would they need a global compensation mechanism? How about implementing natural ways that can be used to deal with certain outbreaks. Is this not what science is for?
We need to act now before this gets way out of hand. As a nation, are we really willing to leave our health and safety in the hands of people who only have money on their minds?