Connect with us

Junior Contributors

Unveiling the Illusion: the once “Best” Aquaculture Practices now seem more like the worst

Published

on

Photo Credit: Raw Pixel

BY KAHA G.

In the world of seafood, a revealing spotlight shines on the truth behind salmon farming practices and trust me it’s not pretty.

Over 70 environmental, animal welfare, and community groups from 18 countries have jointly criticized the Global Seafood Alliance, a leading industry trade association, for its greenwashing of industrial salmon farming. The Best Aquaculture Practices (BAP) certification, issued by the alliance, has been under fire for its latest version, BAP Salmon Farm Standard issue 3.0.

In an open letter submitted on the final day of the public consultation, the groups listed evidence of numerous BAP-certified farms and facilities associated with environmental damage, illegal activity, and negative impacts on endangered species, found in all major salmon farming regions, including the: US, Norway, Chile, Canada, Scotland, and Australia.

The groups criticized the new standard for failing to limit critical environmental impacts such as: sea lice, disease, chemicals, and water quality. Instead, the standard relies on farms meeting their minimal legal obligations and following business as usual practices. Earlier exposés by the Outlaw Ocean Project and Corporate Accountability Lab uncovered allegations of forced labor, child labor, and worker exploitation, as well as environmental damage associated with BAP-certified facilities in the Indian shrimp supply chain.

Major supermarkets such as: Amazon, Walmart, and ALDI; Loblaws and Target in North America; Tesco and Sainsbury’s in the UK; and Woolworths and Coles in Australia rely on the BAP certification as part of their responsible seafood sourcing policies. The groups have urged these supermarkets to stop relying on the flawed certification, stop the greenwashing, and conduct their own environmental and human rights due diligence on their seafood supply chains.

According to Kelly Roebuck, SeaChoice representative from Living Oceans Society, “There is mounting evidence that environmental harms and human rights abuses are occurring despite the ‘responsible seafood’ claims of BAP and other certifications. The new BAP Standard is no exception. Farms in Chile’s marine protected areas will be eligible for certification; so, will farms in: Canada, Scotland and Norway with sea lice loads that are lethal to juvenile wild salmon; as well as Australian farms that are driving the endangered Maugean skate towards extinction.”

Canadian signatories have also criticized the alliance, with Karen Wristen, Executive Director, Living Oceans Society, stating that “It is utterly irresponsible that all British Columbia salmon farms are BAP certified and sold to unsuspecting shoppers as ‘environmentally responsible.’ Claiming ‘best practice’ doesn’t cut it when the practices allowed by certifications are simply farms obeying the law and industry norms that continue to threaten wild salmon populations.”

In simple terms, the seafood products carrying the BAP certification may not be as environmentally sustainable, or responsible as they claim to be. Considering that major supermarkets worldwide rely on the BAP certification as part of their responsible seafood sourcing policies, we could be doing more harm than good to the environment depending on who we purchase from.

If the certification system is flawed, it could mean that we are being misled and may unknowingly purchase seafood products that have negative environmental or social impacts. This is why we should research these things, and not let ourselves be deceived by Greenwashing. After all this, the once “Best” Aquaculture Practices now seem more like the worst.

Junior Contributors

Experiences that will put you ahead in the Skilled Trades and Technologies Industry

Published

on

Photo Credit: Way Home Studio

BY KHADIJA KARIM

A number of career opportunities that exist in skilled trades and technologies within Ontario. So far, the government has 144 skilled trades such: as mechanical, electrical, automotive, and manufacturing. If your child is interested in a career in skilled trades and technologies, Skills Ontario will provide you with some helpful tips and resources to get your child started.

Skills Ontario offers week-long summer camps for grade seven and eight students. The camps provide children with the opportunity to experience multiple career paths with activities. Students can also participate in the Career Awareness Workshop where they will hear about many of Ontario’s skilled trades including construction and industrial. Parents and students may access the application provided by Skills Ontario, which includes an interactive quiz that will link student interests to a trade occupation.

Students in Grades 11 and 12 can learn more about apprenticeships with their guidance counselors, or OYAP coordinators. Most schools have a trades course, and students can participate in the Skills Ontario Competition. Volunteer opportunities are also there with Skills Ontario where students can experience and meet people in the trade.

Students in college interested in entering the trades should speak to their academic advisors. If students are currently in a trades, or technology program they can compete in the post-secondary Skills Ontario Competition that gives students a chance to connect with potential future employers and display their skills. Connecting with these people makes finding jobs easier for students.

Skills Ontario has a YouTube channel with videos about different trades careers, it also has a podcast called “Skills Ontario Trades & Tech Talk.” The podcast is about different careers and other things, such as post-secondary education and wages.

By exploring these resources, students can begin to use those experiences that will put them ahead in the skilled trades and technologies industry.

Continue Reading

Junior Contributors

When does procedural knowledge become harmful? The dual nature of the flow state

Published

on

BY KAHA G.

This week in my Theory of Knowledge (TOK) class, we talked about propositional and procedural knowledge. My teacher showed us a video of Keith Jarrett, a famous pianist. In the video, Jarrett said that when he plays, he doesn’t plan out each note; he just plays. This led us to a discussion about whether his knowledge is propositional, or procedural. We agreed it’s mostly procedural since it comes naturally to him while playing.

My teacher also introduced the idea of the flow state, which is a mental state where a person is fully absorbed in an activity, and Jarrett seems to enter this flow state during his performances. My teacher then explained that flow states are often linked to happiness. In a class he taught on happiness, he explained that people who are truly happy tend to experience flow often because they’re doing things they love.

This got me thinking: are flow states always positive? For example, people with unhealthy habits, like overusing social media, playing video games too much, or even taking drugs, often feel this same kind of flow. Even though they might feel happy in the moment, these behaviors can harm them and the people around them. This leads us to the topic of this article, when does procedural knowledge become harmful?

What’s the difference between propositional and procedural knowledge?

Propositional knowledge is knowing facts, like learning how to conjugate French verbs. It’s something you must think about. Procedural knowledge is knowing how to do something without thinking, like driving/walking home or, in Jarrett’s case, playing the piano without planning each note.

When does procedural knowledge become harmful?

While procedural knowledge is helpful in many ways, it can also be dangerous when it’s connected to bad habits. Think about people who are addicted to video games, social media, or drugs. They often get into a “zoned-out” or flow state, where they lose track of time, but these habits can be harmful, especially when done too much.

For example, someone might feel a sense of flow when eating, because they love food. If this becomes their way of handling stress, it can lead to overeating and health problems. The same goes for someone who uses social media as an escape, spending hours scrolling without realizing the impact on their well-being.

This is why it’s important to be aware of our habits. While procedural knowledge lets us do things automatically, it can also make it hard to break negative habits. So, what can we take from this? Not all procedural knowledge is good. Sometimes, what feels like happiness might be harmful in the long run.

I want to leave you with these questions: To what extent can the pursuit of happiness conflict with long-term well-being, and why do we often seek distractions and unhealthy flow states, even when we know they can hurt us?

Continue Reading

Junior Contributors

Protect your children; you truly never know who is watching

Published

on

BY KAHA G.

Imagine being born into the trade of being a social media sensation at just four years old, with your mom running your account. Your mom posts sweet and innocent videos like “What I dress my daughter in vs. what grandma does,” and prank videos.

You climb the ladder of success until you’ve attained the title of the third, or fourth most popular four-year-old on TikTok with 17 million followers. Gaining the attention of local news stations, with the story of a single mom starting these videos to save memories now turned into a way to save money, attaining partnerships along the way. However, the fame dies down a bit.

Unfortunately, this is where your life takes a turn, when your mom starts taking video suggestions from viewers and the content becomes extremely suspicious and suggestive to the point where articles are being sent out in concern and worry for you. All this happening without your knowledge.

This is the story of Wren Eleanor, and by the end of this article, you might want to stop posting, or even remove your child from posts ever again.

“Wren.eleanor,” a mom-run TikTok account that started up around 2019-2020, has been facing major controversy over the past couple of years. In the beginning, Jacqueline (the mom) posted content about her child similar to the other mom influencers, but there were only a couple of instances where her videos went viral. However, there was one “shortcut to success,” when a video of Wren was posted showing her bare leg, or her wearing a bikini with the hashtag “bikini model.” While the intention might have been completely pure, this was the start of Jacqueline’s eye raising behaviour.

Her videos began consisting of Wren eating suggestively shaped foods. For example, Jacqueline would post videos of Wren eating pickles, whipped cream, foot-long corn dogs, Costco hot dogs, her taking large bites, food being fed to her in questionable ways, and being pushed to levels of discomfort.

This wasn’t the only change happening; her video thumbnails would be with Wren with an open mouth, a really big food item, or even a flash of her diaper. Even some speculated that these videos were orchestrated in response to being paid for by viewers, as in one of her videos, Wren was chewing a piece of gum and then said, “I swallowed it,” and right after saying “Is that okay?”

Her videos weren’t only attracting views on TikTok, but the number of people saving Wren’s videos using the “Favourite” feature was on the rise as well. It was evident that Wren’s anonymous viewers enjoyed the content so much that watching it once was not enough. For instance, a video of her eating a corn dog got more than 100,000 favourites, and in others it reached over 400,000.

Jacqueline started facing controversy around July 2022, when news outlets began reporting how creepy the content was. They pointed out how her fanbase wasn’t only just mothers and kids, but grown men saying things like, “Hear me out,”She kinda hot,” and “There is no way that baby does not have a boyfriend,” to say what they are going to do to her, if you catch my drift. This wasn’t the only thing concerning the public, but it was the searches associated with her name such as: deep fake, scandalous outfits, pickles, and fair eats.

Lastly, in December 2023, TikTok stopped paying content creators for videos under a minute long, which made up quite a lot of Wren and Jacqueline videos, and people were asking if she was not in it for the money then what she was doing it for? Well, from an investigation by the New York Times into child influencers, parent-run accounts are known to sell: “photos, exclusive chat sessions, and even worn leotards to their fanbase.” If these allegations were true, then this means that Jacqueline isn’t just ignorant, and that she’s purposely exploiting her child to grown men for money.

Overall, I acknowledge that posting your children online should be a safe thing to do. It’s not fair that creeps are tuning in too, but the fact of the matter is that they ARE watching your children, and it is YOUR responsibility to protect your children from these lowlifes.

We all wish the world was a safe place to share whatever cute moments of our children with others, but that’s simply not the kind of place we live in, and it will never be. So please, protect your children from the watchful eyes of people with ill intent, and if you want to keep your children online still, then block, or remove people you don’t know from your followers, and private your account for only close friends and family to see because we truly never know who is watching.

https://www.parents.com/mom-of-tiktok-preschooler-wren-eleanor-facing-backlash-8612986

Continue Reading

Trending