Are We Hypnotized – We are in the grip of a narrative that is totally wrong

BY SIMONE J. SMITH

“The people will believe what the media tells them they believe.” George Orwell

This week I am presenting to the community a documentary that focuses on a subject that is controversial, an untold story, and exploration of a fascinating aspect of our world. The subject matter will evoke strong emotions and is meant to provoke thought. It provides credible sources, expert interviews, and verifiable facts. It is brimming with personal stories, powerful testimonials, and intense footage that contribute to its emotional resonance.

The Plandemic series is an eye-opening collection of films that dares to explore untold narratives. The series is widely recognized as the first to warn the world of crimes against humanity that are now being brought to light.

PLANDEMIC 1

The first PLANDEMIC, a 26-minute documentary, has been seen by over one billion people worldwide, setting a historic record. This documentary exposes hidden agendas, questions mainstream narratives, and sparks a global conversation.

PLANDEMIC 2: INDOCTORNATION

The premiere of PLANDEMIC 2: Indoctrination set streaming records with two million viewers attending the global livestream. Journey deeper into the web of deception as Plandemic two uncovers the untold stories and exposes the powerful forces manipulating our world.

PLANDEMIC 3: THE GREAT AWAKENING

This week, our cover story is focused on the last installment of the Plandemic Series, and I am going to do my best to list the points that really stood out, topics that we as a community, as a nation must pay attention to before it is too late. The documentary starts off funny, but this is not a joking matter. In this last installment, you will witness the culmination of truth-seeking as PLANDEMIC 3: The Great Awakening unravels the layers of corruption. Allow me to take you through some of the topics that you will be seeing.

“In order to conquer people in this societal environment, you have to do so through the mind.” Edward Griffin 1969

Socialism; the Transition Stage to Communism

At a women’s night town hall in November 2013, then-Liberal Party Leader Trudeau was asked, “Which nation, besides Canada, do you most admire and why?”

“There’s a level of admiration I actually have for China,” Trudeau responded. “Because their basic dictatorship is allowing them to actually turn their economy around on a dime and saying, ‘We need to go greenest fastest, we need to start, you know, investing in solar.’”

“There is a flexibility that I know [former Conservative Prime Minister] Stephen Harper must dream about of having a DICTATORSHIP (yes, he said THAT word) that he can do everything he wanted, that I find quite interesting,” he continued.

Our Prime Minister worships a country that has allowed hundreds of thousands of their people to die, to be tortured, and to be controlled.

Trudeau invoked the Emergencies Act for the first time in Canada’s history, allowing the federal government to freeze assets, suspend the insurance of the Freedom Convoy protesters, and target crowdfunding platforms and cryptocurrency transactions under “terrorist financing” rules.

“This is about following the money. This is about stopping the financing of these illegal blockades,” Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland said at a press conference. “We are today serving notice that if your truck is being used in these illegal blockades your corporate accounts will be frozen.”

“The insurance on your vehicle will be suspended,” she continued. “Send your semi-trailers home, the Canadian economy needs them to be doing legitimate work, not to be illegally making us all poor.”

Here was the beginning of what looked to be the punishing of those who stood up to the government; punishing individuals whose only interest was protecting the freedoms of themselves, their families, and their communities.

This idea of punishing individuals who do not comply is not novel. Let’s also look at a level of control that is slowly being implemented, the idea of the Social Credit System.

China’s Social Credit System

In 2020, China announced that it would be implementing a social credit system whereby individuals and companies throughout the country could increase their “social credit score.” This score aims to keep track of the good and bad deeds of citizens, rewarding those who do good in their communities and punishing those who don’t.

The data collected by China for this social experiment primarily came from digital sources, including: interactions on social media, search history, and purchasing habits. Citizens were monitored according to their actions on the internet, and each had a chance to affect their credit scores. Other sources for data included: government agencies, information from not-for-profits, criminal records, and financial institutions.

Finally, China began to use video surveillance to monitor an individual’s actions in the real world. They began using advanced facial recognition technology to track people as they moved through and interacted with the world around them.

Good deeds (subjectively) that increased your social credit system standing included: donating blood, doing volunteer work, taking care of the elderly, and safe driving practices. Purchasing books instead of video games and dedicating time to schoolwork were also examples of how to increase one’s score.

Bad deeds (subjectively) that decreased your social credit standing included: not paying your debts, unsafe driving, posting anti-government content on social media, spreading rumors (conspiracy theories), infidelity, and buying too many video games.

If you were good, you would get perks that included: decreased electric bills, access to universities and higher education, easier access to public housing, free gym access, and a higher chance of securing a loan. Some citizens with high scores also enjoyed lower public transportation costs and tax breaks, as well as no requirement for a deposit when booking hotels or travel reservations.

China is ranked as one of the  world’s most miserable countries, and our leader wants to pattern Canada after it? Something does not sit well thinking about that.

Mass Formation: what is that?

As a journalist and researcher, I have become concerned about the consensus narrative I have been seeing in the mainstream. There is a disputed phenomenon of large-scale mass formation that has risen from four psychological conditions that currently exist and are closing off human thinking. I want to be clear about something here: people don’t necessarily act from an evil intent, but more a psychological process to survive environmental conditions that is 95% subconscious.

The four conditions that allow mass formation to emerge are:

Lack of Social Bond

It’s a psychological social media paradox: people are interacting together online with their avatars, but they aren’t their true selves. They don’t create the intimacy or vulnerability that comes from shared experience.

People Experience life as Meaningless or Senseless

A Gallup poll from 2012 done with people in 142 countries revealed that 63% of respondents admitted to being so disengaged at work that they were sleepwalking through their day, putting time but not passion into their work.

Free-Floating Anxiety

Free-floating anxiety is creating a deep psychological discontent. In Belgium alone, 300 million doses of anti-depressants, anti-psychotics and sleeping pills are used each year in a population of 11 million. A study from the World Health Organization says that one in five people—over 300 million—actually have anxiety disorders. They not only have anxiety but qualify as having disorders.

Free-floating Frustration and Aggression

People feel frustrated and aggressive without really knowing the cause of their annoyance and anger.

When these four conditions are fulfilled, if a narrative is distributed through the mass media identifying an object of anxiety (COVID-19) and providing a strategy (mask wearing and vaccination) to deal with that object, mass formation can thrive. All the free-floating anxiety and anger, now turning into panic, becomes attached to the object (COVID-19). Sudden connection through this heroic struggle together against the object creates a new solidarity, a social bond that has been lacking, which in turn, creates meaning. People then feel that they can control their psychological discontent by participating in the strategy, even if it’s utterly absurd.

Participation in the strategy has nothing to do with facts; it’s to preserve this new social bond created by fighting together to defeat the object of their collective anxiety (we are in this together).

Karl Marx Abolition of the Family

“The Communists disdain to conceal their views and aims,” Marx declared in his famous manifesto (Manifesto of the Communist Party). “They openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions. Let the ruling classes tremble at a Communist revolution.”

For the African-Caribbean community, this section might be triggering to some because it focuses on an organization that many of us hold in high regard, Black Lives Matter. PLANDEMIC: Part Three did an excellent job of exposing certain aspects of this movement that I had no idea about.

First of all, I bring up Karl Marx because the founders of BLM have spoken to the fact that they admire his views and have actually called themselves “Marxist!”

In a now scrubbed page off their website, BLM’s main objective was to disrupt the nuclear family. In September 2020 Black Lives Matter removed a page on its website that disparaged the “Western-prescribed nuclear family structure.”

The group, whose co-founder Patrisse Cullors has described herself and fellow co-founder Alicia Garza as “trained Marxists,” removed a page titled “What We Believe,” that included its public policy positions as well as describing itself as part of the “Global Black family.”

“We disrupt the Western-prescribed nuclear family structure requirement by supporting each other as extended families and ‘villages’ that collectively care for one another, especially our children, to the degree that mothers, parents, and children are comfortable,” the website formerly read.

Some critics claim that BLM aimed to “Dismantle the patriarchal practice” that leads to mothers having to work double shifts to make ends meet.

Let’s go back to Marx; he admits that destroying the family is a thorny topic, even for revolutionaries. “Abolition of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists,” he writes.  “The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its complement vanishes, and both will vanish with the vanishing of capital.”

In the documentary one the founders actually is happy that her book is compared to Mao’s Red Book. For those who don’t know Mao’s Red Book It’s an icon of China and communism as well as a work of propaganda. More than a billion copies have been published, making the book, often wrapped in its distinctive vinyl cover, one of the most widely produced of all time. During China’s “Cultural Revolution” it became virtually mandatory to own and carry one.

Well, what does this have to do with BLM? Let’s take a look at how like Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, BLM has expressed their affinity for China. The Black Futures Lab, a liberal initiative launched by a Black Lives Matter co-founder, lists as its financial sponsor the pro-China Chinese Progressive Association, raising questions about the extent of China’s support for the increasingly powerful protest movement.

China has made no secret of its support for the Black Lives Matter movement. It has cheered on the demonstrators and slammed U.S. “racism and police violence” in the Chinese Communist Party outlet China Daily. You don’t have to believe me, but believe the facts; go to the website for the Black Futures Lab, a venture of Black Lives Matter founder Alicia Garza, and click on the “Donate” button. It will ask you to send your money to an obscure organization, the Chinese Progressive Association, explaining that “Black Futures Lab is a fiscally sponsored project of the Chinese Progressive Association.”

Now we have the state turning children against parents (something that has been reportedly done in China), we don’t have a clear definition of what a woman or a man is, and there is a decline of healthy femininity and masculinity.

There is so much in this hour and 44-minute documentary, but it is necessary for us as a community to connect the dots. Something is not right, and it is going to be hard to admit to ourselves, but many of us have been hypnotized.