From fact-checking to cognitive injections: The race to control our minds is in full force

BY MICHAEL THOMAS

You know you are in trouble when your government in combination with Big Pharma has spent $100 million to create what they called “cognitive vaccines” aka mind-controlling injections to keep you stupid and quiet.

All this is done with the narrative of protecting the public from what these leaders deemed a mix of propaganda and dissenting viewpoints.

Recently a group of doctors and other professionals, who have been canceled and ridiculed for their descending views against governments and their health narratives, discussed what’s at stake.

Speaking on the constant censoring and so-called fact-checking that has taken over the internet, “We’d like to restructure consensus-building so that … governance represents the people,” Nicole Shanahan, a Silicon Valley tech entrepreneur said.

Speaking on the plans to inject folks with views that go against the government narrative, Mike Benz, a former U.S. Department of State official said, “They have glitzy 10-minute promo videos,” describing attempts to create psychological inoculations against what authorities deem “fake news.”

Again, you know you are in serious trouble when your government takes preemptive measures against folks just asking relevant questions, or questions in general.

Canada has become such a place where the government is taking preemptive actions to discredit dissenting voices regularly. A case in point is Trudeau’s regime’s new internet laws and Bills. Canada, like a lot of other places, for decades has had its fair share of haters but recently, it has now become clear to Trudeau after successfully removing his political cataract at the WEF (World Economic Forum), that his country needs strong hate speech Bills.

Among other things discussed at this forum was how: de-platforming, narrative control, and censorship have contributed to a loss of faith in traditional media outlets that were once viewed as trusted and unbiased.

It is indeed a scary thing when government agencies team up with tech giants and academic institutions to control information flow like we are witnessing in real-time.  Imagine resurrecting techniques like the McCarran Internal Security Act, which was passed in the 1950s, to now use on a new perceived threat, the citizens.

All this, according to Benz, is because those in power do not want the civilian class to speak freely online for fear of losing control of this order. One of the tools that has been used heavily in the last four years to control what can be debated online is fact-checking.

This is a favourite tool of those who are specialists in hiding the facts. Let’s have a look at how this is extremely destructive to any democracy, who is funding the lies, and suppressing the truth.

Imagine FactCheck.org, the same folks that canceled you for questioning the COVID narrative, is being funded and supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, a philanthropic organization funded by pharmaceutical giant and vaccine maker Johnson & Johnson (J&J). Well, this was reported by YouTube commentator Jimmy Dore, “These fact check organizations are not there to check facts, they are there to push a political point of view and an agenda and to discredit people.”

These two fraternities, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and Johnson & Johnson (J&J) are in bed with each other to the point of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation holding nearly $2 billion in J&J stock, while fact-checking you the citizens.

Even search engine giant Google is in on the action. In 2018, Google invested $27,000,000 in Vaccitech to make vaccines for flu, and MERS. Vaccitech calls itself “The future of mass vaccine production.” Although Google claims to promote politically and commercially neutral searches, when independent-minded people try Googling COVID-19 injection safety, they are guided in the direction of Big Pharma lies daily.

So, next time your comments are fact-checked, do a bit of research as to who is really behind the fact-checking, and funding. You might just be unpleasantly surprised.

REFERENCES: