PART 3 – Art Remains one of the last Unfiltered Voices of Defiance

BY SIMONE J. SMITH

All I wanna say is that they don’t really care about us

All I wanna say is that they don’t really care about us

Tell me what has become of my rights

Am I invisible ’cause you ignore me?

Your proclamation promised me free liberty, now

I’m tired of bein’ the victim of shame

They’re throwin’ me in a class with a bad name

I can’t believe this is the land from which I came

You know I really do hate to say it

The government don’t wanna see

But if Roosevelt was livin’, he wouldn’t let this be, no, no

Michael Jackson, released on April 16^th, 1996, as the fourth single from his ninth album, HIStory: Past, Present and Future, Book I (1995)

Who was “They,” and what did he mean when he said, ‘But if Roosevelt was livin’, he wouldn’t let this be, no, no.”

I am about to take readers on the last leg of this journey, and I am going to use a medium that many of us are attuned to. I want to thank Grant and Michael for bringing us to this point, and now, I am going to bring a little from the past into the future. What is going to happen if we continue to act like nothing is going on. The writing is on the wall.

“Art doesn’t just imitate life—it warns of what life may become. When Michael cried out, ‘They don’t really care about us,’ he wasn’t just speaking to the past—he was echoing the future we now face. A future where freedom is replaced with compliance, and silence is the price of survival.”

The song is known for its powerful and direct lyrics that criticize systemic oppression and societal indifference. Jackson’s aim was to bring attention to the pain and frustration experienced by those facing prejudice and inequality. I want to be very clear here; this is not a Black, White thing. No! This is a human thing. What we are about to face is going to affect ALL of us on a level that cannot be conceived. I bet you if we had told you 20 years ago that we would experience a pandemic so catastrophic that it literally shut down the world, you would have looked at us like we were crazy.

Actually, there were some readers who did just that; criticized us and called us conspiracy theorists when we were doing our best to warn you about what was to come, but I digress…

Art has long been a powerful vessel for: truth, resistance, and awakening, serving as both a mirror and a megaphone for the human condition. For generations, artists have woven messages of empowerment into their: lyrics, films, books, and artwork warning of political and global chaos, corruption, and the creeping grip of control. In an era of crisis acceleration and compliance conditioning, where: digital governance, economic resets, and AI-driven authority threaten individual freedoms, art remains one of the last unfiltered voices of defiance.

Art has the power to expose full-spectrum global control and social restructuring, challenging the systems that seek to silence dissent. Through: rhythm, poetry, and raw emotion, art refuses to be tamed—echoing the heartbeat of revolution and the pulse of a world on the brink. What I am going to do is share curations that speak to what is to come.

“But if Roosevelt was livin’, he wouldn’t let this be, no, no.”  Michael Jackson; HIStory: Past, Present and Future, Book I (1995)

President Franklin D. Roosevelt, a champion of democracy and a relentless opponent of centralized tyranny, would have viewed today’s globalist agenda with profound concern and fierce resistance. A leader who navigated the Great Depression with the New Deal and waged war against fascism, FDR believed in economic security for the common man and a government accountable to its people—not to unelected international bodies.

He would have warned that the aforementioned: Agenda 21, Agenda 2030, the Paris Climate Agreement, and the WHO Pandemic Treaty, while cloaked in promises of sustainability and public health, could serve as mechanisms for eroding national sovereignty and imposing a top-down system of global control.

Roosevelt, who famously took on Wall Street and corporate monopolies, would have opposed financial restructuring schemes that consolidate power into elite institutions, recognizing the danger of a world where private banking cartels dictate national policies.

His commitment to American self-determination would have led him to criticize digital surveillance, ESG mandates, and AI-driven governance, which he would have seen as tools of compliance conditioning rather than genuine progress.

While Roosevelt was a firm believer in international cooperation—evident in his role in founding the United Nations—he would have rejected any system that strips citizens of their rights under the guise of “global governance.”

He was criticized in his time for expanding federal power, yet he did so with a clear mandate to uplift the American worker, not to concentrate authority into unaccountable technocratic hands. Were he alive today, he would likely rally the people against the creeping influence of mass migration as a destabilization tactic, warning that engineered demographic shifts must not serve as a tool for global restructuring. Echoing his famous declaration “The only thing we have to fear is fear itself”—he would remind us that manufactured crises are the playbook of those who seek to rule through fear rather than freedom.

Til I’m laid to rest

Always be depressed

There’s no life in the West

I know the East is the best

All the propaganda they spread

Tongues will have to confess

‘Til I’m Laid To Rest · Buju Banton Til Shiloh ℗ 1995

It’s interesting, because Buju was already telling us that there was no life in the West. It takes me into The First Wave – Crisis Acceleration & Compliance Conditioning. “What are you talking about Simone?” Well, let’s take a look.

The Pandemic as a Catalyst (2020-2021)

We all most recently experienced a time when Governments worldwide imposed unprecedented lockdowns, mandates, and digital surveillance measures. WHO & UN promoted global cooperation while centralizing control over national health policies. This was when vaccine passports were introduced as the first mass-scale digital ID system; the beginning of our conditioning

The Government-imposed shutdowns caused: inflation, job losses, and dependence on financial relief packages. The World Economic Forum (WEF) began promoting “The Great Reset”, framing the crisis as an opportunity for systemic transformation. Mask and vaccine debates fueled societal divisions, at an unprecedented scale normalizing censorship and punitive measures for dissenters.

The pandemic was a segway into what is now the WEF & WHO Pandemic Treaty Developments. WHO proposed an international treaty granting it authority over future global health emergencies. This would mean that there will be a group of people, who will be making decisions when it comes to your health and wellness. That’s right! This unelected governing body would have control over how you navigate your personal health. Think about that.

Mass Migration & Population Displacement (2023-2024)

Canada has historically relied on immigration to address labour shortages (West Indian Domestic Scheme) and bolster its economy. However, the rapid increase in immigration, particularly of temporary residents, has put pressure on housing, infrastructure, and social services.

There’s a growing concern among some Canadians about the impact of high immigration levels on housing affordability, the availability of social services, and the overall cost of living. Surveys indicate a rising number of Canadians who believe that immigration levels are too high, and there are concerns about integration and the impact on Canadian culture

Late 2024, the Canadian government announced adjustments to its immigration levels plan for 2025-2027, aiming to reduce the number of permanent residents and manage the volume of temporary residents. The 2025–2027 Immigration Levels Plan is expected to result in a marginal population decline of 0.2% in both 2025 and 2026, before returning to a population growth of 0.8% in 2027. I am curious with an election around the corner if policies like this will change. If we follow the 2030 Agenda, it sure will.

Smart Cities & 15-Minute City Prototypes Emerge

We have seen urban transformation projects popping up all over Toronto (Concord CityPlace), and in other parts of the world (Paris, Shanghai, Oxford, Barcelona, Bogotá, Buenos Aires, Melbourne, Milan and Portland) that align with the push for centralized living.

This global proliferation of “smart cities” and 15-minute city prototypes, is driven by technological integration and localized service delivery, and presents a complex migration dynamic. These initiatives, often framed within the sustainable development goals of Agenda 2030, aim to optimize urban living. However, the common media consumer often misses the potential for: increased surveillance, data collection, and centralized control inherent in these systems, raising concerns about privacy and individual liberties.

The allure of enhanced convenience and efficiency could lead to internal migration towards these technologically advanced hubs, potentially exacerbating regional inequalities and creating a two-tiered society. The focus on hyper-local living could inadvertently restrict movement and foster a sense of dependency on centralized systems, subtly eroding personal autonomy. This potential for increased social control, under the guise of sustainability and efficiency, poses a significant danger, especially if implemented without robust democratic oversight and safeguards

Let’s look at the concept of “climate lockdowns” (which are being talked about more and more) and 15-minute cities. Together, they share a potential for restricted movement under the guise of environmental sustainability.

¹While 15-minute cities aim to localize services, reducing the need for extensive travel, the fear arises that these systems could be repurposed for climate lockdowns, where movement is further restricted based on carbon emission targets (heavily weighted discussions on carbon taxing), or environmental emergencies.

It does raise serious ethical concerns about the balance between environmental protection and individual liberties, and the real possibility of these systems being used for social control beyond their stated purpose. The lack of open, transparent debate about these risks leaves the public vulnerable to potential abuses of power, something that unfortunately we continue to ignore.

I can see why Buju spoke of being, “Always depressed, there’s no life in the West.” There will be a lot of depressed people if Agenda 30 comes to fruition.

2025-2026: The Great Transition – Digital Governance, Economic Reset & AI Control

As we move through our timeline, you will begin to notice a rise in digital-only financial systems, tied to carbon footprint tracking and ESG compliance. Governments will impose restrictions on cash transactions, incentivizing CBDC adoption. It was interesting to watch COVID’s impact on the use of cash. Some of it was due to some people not wanting to handle physical money for fear of perhaps being exposed to the virus. Also, some stores were not accepting cash for health and safety reasons.

A 2021 Global Payments Report by Worldpay found that the use of cash for in-store payments fell by half, or more in: Canada, the U.K., France, Norway, Sweden, and Australia. The report projected that by 2024, cash would account for less than 10 percent of in-store payments in the U.S. and just 13 percent of payments worldwide. Over that same time period, the report projected digital wallet payments to account for more than a third (33 percent) of all in-store payments (16 percent in the U.S.). Think about how often you have cash. They have made it so easy to just “tap.”

AI-driven social credit systems are emerging at a rapid rate, integrating behavioral tracking and financial control. Governments deploy AI-powered surveillance in smart cities to monitor public behavior.

China has been at the forefront of implementing widespread surveillance. Cities like Shenzhen are known for their extensive use of facial recognition, and AI-powered surveillance for various purposes, including crime prevention and traffic management.

London has implemented AI-powered CCTV monitoring and facial recognition technology, particularly by the Metropolitan Police, for crime prevention. This has led to significant debates about privacy.

Singapore’s “Smart Nation” initiative incorporates AI surveillance across various sectors, including public spaces, traffic management, and environmental monitoring. They utilize camera networks with AI analysis for many civic functions.

You might as well also prepare yourself for: increased biometric monitoring, facial recognition, and digital ID enforcement. ​​We have already witnessed widespread social media censorship, and Grant and Michael have both spoken about mainstream media being consolidated under fewer corporate entities. Soon you will be required to comply with: carbon allowances, tracked via digital ID systems. High-carbon lifestyle activities (e.g., travel, meat consumption, home heating) will be taxed, or restricted.

Nosedive: Black Mirror (2016)

I know we have some Netflix and chill readers, and if you are, you might be familiar with “Nosedive,”  the first episode of season three of Black Mirror. It was written by: Charlie Brooker, Michael Schur, and Rashida Jones, and was released on October 21^st, 2016.

In this particular episode of Black Mirror, AI is being used to create social credit systems. The ratings directly impact a person’s access to services and social mobility. The AI-driven systems that integrate behavioral tracking and financial control, potentially lead to a scenario where social standing is quantifiable and impactful.  In “Nosedive,” while not explicitly surveillance-focused, the constant rating and sharing create a society where everyone is constantly observed and judged.

“Nosedive” suggests a society where access to resources and opportunities is dictated by social standing. In the episode, higher ratings grant access to better housing, transportation, and services. We are being prepared for a similar system where compliance with carbon allowances and social norms determines access and freedom.  There is an erosion of privacy as every interaction is public and rated, and the episode’s focus on social validation and conformity hints at a society where dissent is discouraged, and a unified narrative is promoted.

2027-2030: The Final Lock-In – Full-Spectrum Global Control & Social Restructuring
Global Governance Solidifies (2027-2028)

 For my readers out there, I want to introduce two books to you that speak to what the end goal of these agendas are: “The Fourth Industrial Revolution” by Klaus Schwab, and the infamous “1984” by George Orwell

“The Fourth Industrial Revolution” by Klaus Schwab

While not dystopian fiction, Schwab’s book outlines the potential future shaped by technologies like AI, biotechnology, and digital currencies. It presents a vision of a radically altered global society, with some critics arguing that it can align with the concerns of economic and political control.

In the book, Schwab emphasizes the convergence of technologies like: AI, blockchain, and the Internet of Things, which are central to the: digital ID, CBDC, and AI governance aspects of the 2030 timeline. He also discusses the growing role of global institutions and the need for international cooperation to manage the challenges and opportunities of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. This directly aligns with the idea of strengthened global economic controls and the increased influence of organizations like the UN, WEF, and WHO.

Schwab highlights the increasing availability of data and the potential for its use in decision-making and governance, which relates to concerns about biometric surveillance, AI-driven social credit systems, and the use of data to enforce compliance. The book acknowledges the potential for these technologies to be used for social control, although it generally presents them in a more optimistic light, focusing on their potential benefits.

While Schwab generally presents the Fourth Industrial Revolution as a positive force, he himself acknowledges the potential for negative consequences, such as: increased inequality, job displacement, and the erosion of privacy.

“1984” by George Orwell

A timeless classic that delves deep into the consequences of a totalitarian regime that uses surveillance, mind control, and strict social control to govern every aspect of life. This is often referenced in discussions about: government overreach, digital surveillance, and personal freedom. George Orwell’s “1984” serves as a stark warning about the potential dangers of unchecked power and the erosion of individual liberties, themes that resonate strongly with the concerns raised by Agenda 2030. We will do a deep dive into aspects of the book that directly relate to Agenda 2030.

The “Ministry of Truth” in “1984” rewrites history and manipulates information to maintain control over the population and warns against the potential for governments and global institutions to use propaganda and censorship to shape public opinion, and suppress dissent. In 2024, The Government of Canada introduced the Online Harms Bill C-63 to regulate and suppress “harmful speech.” The Bill requires social media companies to remove certain speech, and if not, they will incur substantial fines. ​​

Parts of the Bill are important, particularly the offences dealing with child protection and non-consensual disclosure of intimate images. However, the remaining parts of the Bill creates a vast bureaucracy tasked with surveillance and censorship of all public online speech in Canada. This goes into the concept of “Newspeak” in “1984,” a language designed to limit thought and expression, highlighting the dangers of controlling language to control thought, which is relevant to concerns about how language might be used to frame and justify restrictive policies. Here we could easily introduce Bill C-18, Under the guise of supporting local news outlets in Canada, Bill C-18 aimed to censor all news outlets on social media platforms unless their companies offer compensation to Canadian news outlets for the news they provide. Neither Canadian news outlets, nor social media companies asked for such a structure; and yet, this kind of legislation had long been on the agenda for Canadian Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez.

George Orwell was somehow able to predict that we would live in a society where individual liberties and privacy are completely extinguished, with no room for personal autonomy, or dissent.  The concept of “Oligarchical Collectivism” in “1984” warns against the dangers of concentrated power in the hands of a ruling elite, which resonates with the concerns about global governance institutions and the potential for them to dictate national policies. The book warns of the dangers of large controlling entities that have the ability to change reality for their own benefit.

In essence, “1984” serves as a cautionary, and now recognized as futuristic tale about the potential for technology and centralized power to be used to create a totalitarian society, where individual liberties are sacrificed for the sake of control.

The Final Choice: Resistance or Compliance

What do we have to look forward to if Agenda 2030 targets are achieved:

• There will be a complete removal of physical cash and full CBDC financial control.
• There will be global governance institutions fully operational with UN/WEF/WHO dictating national policies.
• There will be restricted private property ownership, with shared economy systems replacing individual ownership.
• An AI-enforced social credit system will be implemented worldwide, dictating financial and travel access.
• Biometric surveillance will be full scale, making personal anonymity nearly impossible.
• Population reduction incentives will accelerate, using climate and economic justifications.

We will have no autonomy. No control.

I know. It is a lot, but this is information that you will not find on CBC, Global News, CityTV, or CP24. Is this what we want as a nation, as a people? I would take some time to digest all that you have read here. The unfolding of Agenda 2030 is not a distant possibility, but a present reality, meticulously documented and backed by key global institutions such as the UN, WEF, and WHO.

This convergence of financial, health, climate, and social control systems is giving rise to a new form of global governance, one that surpasses anything we have ever encountered. Yet, while the challenges ahead may seem insurmountable, they are not without solutions.

WE must unite in resistance, fostering economic independence, building parallel financial systems, safeguarding privacy, and engaging in grassroots political action. The time to act is now. By understanding the clear trajectory of this agenda, we have the unique opportunity to craft strategies that can dismantle, or at least mitigate the emerging control grid.

The road to 2030 is being paved as we speak, but it is not too late to shape our own future. Let us stand together, informed, resolute, and determined to protect the freedoms that are rightfully ours.

CONTINUE READING  THIS SERIES:

PART ONE: Manufacturing Obedience; AI, The WEF & Agenda 2030—The Blueprint for Global Control

PART TWO – Agenda 21 and 30: The Plan Has Always Been Compliance, Impoverishment, and Enslavement

PART THREE – Art Remains one of the last Unfiltered Voices of Defiance

PART FOUR – The Carbon Cage: Election Promises, Global Agendas, and the Trap We’re Already In

REFERENCES:

https://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/44-1/bill/C-18/first-reading

https://www.canada.ca/en/canadian-heritage/services/online-harms.html

https://black-mirror.fandom.com/wiki/Black_Mirror

https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/west-indian-domestic-scheme

https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/05/who-pandemic-treaty-what-how-work/

https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2022/12/27/how-much-money-has-the-west-spent-on-the-ukraine-war

https://www.centuryinitiative.ca/