Connect with us

Community News

“Stop egging me on!” Companies are simply getting better at carefully wording things on their packaging

Published

on

BY SIMONE J. SMITH

“Alright, eggs. That’s all I need,” you say to yourself. “Ah, there we go!”

You make your way to the dairy aisle, scanning the shelves for the eggs: Cage-free. Free-range. Hormone-free. Pasture-raised. Natural. Organic.

It’s gotten more and more challenging to keep track of what all the egg cartons at the supermarket even mean. Consumers want to feel like the chickens producing their eggs have been humanely raised, and they’re willing to shell out cash to anyone who can tell them that’s the case.

There are a lot of options, and we want the chickens who lay eggs to live humane lives, but we have to understand that cheaper food might just be at the expense of something, and in this case, it is at the expense of chickens.

Here’s the thing: Some companies are simply getting better at carefully wording things on their packaging to make it seem like their chickens are living better lives. So, which labels should you look for, and which labels are just clever marketing designed to trick you into paying more for your eggs? Unfortunately, the idea of factory farms is a reality, and how you are getting your eggs is going to horrify you.

Chickens are remarkable creatures known for their egg-laying abilities, but their productive lifespan in this regard varies depending on various factors including breed, health, and environment. Generally, most laying hens will start laying eggs at around five to six months of age and will continue to do so for several years. Factory farming often involves keeping chickens in cramped, unsanitary conditions with little room to move, leading to stress, injuries, and poor welfare. Practices such as: overcrowding, selective breeding for fast growth, and the use of cages, or overcrowded indoor environments raise ethical questions about how the animals are treated.

Factory farming practices, including the heavy use of antibiotics to promote growth and prevent disease in crowded conditions, have raised concerns about the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which can pose a threat to human health. Additionally, the crowded and unsanitary conditions in which chickens are raised can increase the risk of disease transmission among the animals, potentially leading to outbreaks that can affect both animal and human populations.

Let’s look at the lingo they are using to trick you into thinking that you are getting what you think you are getting:

“Cage-free eggs” refers to eggs that come from hens that are not kept in cages. Instead, they are typically housed in large barns, or warehouses where they are free to roam, perch, and lay their eggs in nests. Cage-free systems generally provide hens with more space and the ability to engage in natural behaviors compared to traditional cage systems.

However, it’s important to note that while cage-free systems offer some improvements in animal welfare compared to traditional cages, they do not guarantee that the hens have access to outdoor areas, or natural sunlight, nor do they address other important welfare issues such as beak trimming, or overcrowding. The specific conditions within cage-free facilities can vary widely depending on the farm and the standards they adhere to.

“Free-range eggs” come from hens that are allowed some level of access to the outdoors, as opposed to being confined solely to cages or indoor pens. The term “free-range” suggests that the hens have the ability to roam around and engage in natural behaviors like scratching and pecking. However, there are a few potential catches or considerations with free-range eggs:

  • Different countries and regions have varying definitions and regulations regarding what constitutes “free-range.” Some standards may require a certain amount of outdoor access per hen, while others may be less stringent. This can lead to inconsistency in the quality of life for the hens and the nutritional content of the eggs.
  • In some cases, free-range systems can still involve large numbers of hens crowded into relatively small outdoor spaces. This can lead to competition for resources and potential welfare issues among the hens.

Free-range eggs often come at a higher price point compared to conventional eggs due to the additional space and resources required to produce them. Consumers may need to weigh the perceived benefits of free-range production against the higher cost.

Now we want to present to you some options that might help some of you feel less guilty when cracking that egg at breakfast time:

Animal Welfare Approved

Animal Welfare Approved (AWA) is a certification program that sets rigorous standards for the welfare of farm animals. Established by the non-profit organization, the Animal Welfare Institute, AWA ensures that animals raised for food are treated with respect and care throughout their lives. Farms that receive the AWA certification must adhere to strict criteria regarding living conditions, space allowances, access to the outdoors, and humane handling practices. The certification not only benefits the animals but also empowers consumers to make informed choices that align with their values.

Certified Humane

Certified Humane is a rigorous animal welfare certification program that ensures animals are raised, handled, and slaughtered according to high standards of care and compassion. Administered by Humane Farm Animal Care (HFAC), Certified Humane sets criteria for housing, diet, healthcare, and handling practices on farms and facilities. Farmers and producers who meet these standards provide animals with more spacious and enriched environments, access to the outdoors, and the opportunity to engage in natural behaviors. This certification empowers consumers to make ethical choices, fostering a greater connection between consumers and the animals that provide their food.

Global Animal Partnership

Global Animal Partnership (GAP) is a non-profit organization dedicated to improving the welfare of farm animals around the world. Established in 2008, GAP works with farmers, producers, and retailers to set and implement comprehensive animal welfare standards. These standards cover a range of factors including housing, diet, healthcare, and handling practices. By partnering with stakeholders across the food industry, GAP aims to create a more humane and sustainable future for farm animals, promoting transparency and accountability throughout the supply chain.

We, as humans are guaranteed certain things in life: stressors, taxes, bills and death are the first thoughts that pop to mind. It is not uncommon that many people find a hard time dealing with these daily life stressors, and at times will find themselves losing control over their lives. Simone Jennifer Smith’s great passion is using the gifts that have been given to her, to help educate her clients on how to live meaningful lives. The Hear to Help Team consists of powerfully motivated individuals, who like Simone, see that there is a need in this world; a need for real connection. As the founder and Director of Hear 2 Help, Simone leads a team that goes out into the community day to day, servicing families with their educational, legal and mental health needs.Her dedication shows in her Toronto Caribbean newspaper articles, and in her role as a host on the TCN TV Network.

Community News

“We want 9-8-8 to become as familiar as dialing 9-1-1,” 9-8-8 Celebrates one year serving the community

Published

on

BY SIMONE J. SMITH

The holiday season, a time often associated with joy and celebration, can paradoxically trigger a decline in mental well-being for many. Coupled with the ongoing pressures of inflation, rising crime rates, and the abrupt shift of daylight savings time, particularly in northern regions, these factors can create a perfect storm for individuals struggling with their mental health.

Suicide, a tragic reality, knows no boundaries, impacting people of all ages and backgrounds. In Canada alone, a staggering average of 4,500 lives are lost to suicide each year, translating to approximately 12 individuals per day. The impact of each suicide extends far beyond the individual, leaving a trail of grief and devastation among family, friends, and communities.

On November 30th, 2023, Canada launched 9-8-8 Suicide Crisis Helpline. It is for anyone thinking about suicide, feeling hopeless, or like they are struggling to cope. The Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) in Toronto, Canada’s largest mental health teaching hospital, leads and coordinates delivery of 9-8-8 nationwide. 9-8-8 is funded by the Government of Canada, through the Public Health Agency of Canada.

A growing network of nearly 40 experienced local and national crisis line partners across the country provide culturally appropriate, lifesaving supports to people who call or text the helpline.

Over the past year, 9-8-8 crisis responders have answered more than 300,000 calls and texts to the national helpline. 9-8-8 answers an average of almost 30,000 calls and texts per month – approximately 1,000 calls and texts per day. In Ontario, 9-8-8 responders answer an average of over 12,000 calls and texts per month (more than 135,000 from the launch to October 31st, 2024).

The goal of the three-digit helpline is to prevent suicide by making it as simple as possible for people to get the help they need, when they need it most. 9-8-8 provides urgent, live support by phone and text to people in every province and territory across the country in English and French, 24/7, every day of the year.

Last week, I had a chance to speak with Nika Khossravi, 9-8-8 Crisis Responder, and she shared with me her reason for becoming a responder, and the importance of 9-8-8.

“Last year I experienced the loss of a friend to suicide,” Nika shares, “When I was grieving the loss, I did a lot of reflection, and I realized that I did not have the tools to assist my friend. I dug deep and volunteered and learned a lot. What many of us don’t take into consideration is how suicide affects survivors of suicide. We don’t like to say suicide is contagious, but sometimes it becomes more of a reality, especially when someone close to you has committed suicide.”

What are the biggest challenges you anticipate in ensuring equitable access to the 9-8-8 helpline for all Canadians, including those in remote, rural, and underserved communities,” I inquired?

“It serves every single city in Canada. It is the same as 9-1-1. Let’s be honest, when you are in crisis, you are not thinking about long drawn-out numbers. We want 9-8-8 to become as familiar as dialing 9-1-1,”

“Are there mechanisms for seamless referrals and follow-up care?”

“Responders offer follow calls within 24 hours, and some are able to do referrals to local distress centres. 211 is one of the resource databases that we can provide for them.”

9-8-8 also offers support and advice for people who are worried someone they know may be considering suicide. Whatever you are going through, you don’t have to face your problems on your own. 9-8-8 responders are here to listen. No one who calls or texts 9-8-8 will be turned away. Everyone who contacts 9-8-8 will be assessed for suicide risk.

“What are the initial expectations and long-term goals for the 9-8-8 helpline in terms of reducing suicide rates and improving mental health outcomes for Canadians?”

“We want people to be aware. We are a resource to those who think someone in their lives might be thinking about suicide. We want 9-8-8 to be as familiar to Canadians as 9-1-1.”

By texting or calling 9-8-8, people can connect with a responder who’s ready to
listen and trained to help. 9-8-8 responders work with callers and texters to explore ways to cope when things are overwhelming and find a path to safety. Responder training is informed by evidence, best practices and engagement with organizations representing populations most affected by suicide to ensure that anyone, anywhere, can access the support they need.

For more information and to receive the latest updates, please visit www.988.ca  or connect with them on our social media platforms:
Twitter: @988Canada
Facebook: 988Canada
Instagram: @988Canada
LinkedIn: 988Canada

Continue Reading

Community News

The health disaster caused by the tobacco industry is still ongoing and needs immediate attention

Published

on

BY PAUL JUNOR

The announced lawsuit seeking $500 billion against the tobacco companies could potentially be settled. The Canadian Cancer Society (CCS) issued a press release on October 18th, 2024, in which it expressed reservations. The Ontario government is supportive, but there have been mixed reactions from others.

The proposed lawsuit would dispense the following:

  • $24.7 billion over time to provinces and territories, including $6.3 billion up front, and the remainder paid out as a percentage of tobacco company profits, including 85% of net after-tax profits in the first five years, and then 80% declining to 70% in subsequent years, until the $24.7 billion is paid
  • $4.1 billion to the Quebec class action plaintiffs
  • $2.5 billion to individual victims across Canada beyond the Quebec class action plaintiffs
  • $1.0 billion to a Foundation to fund research for the diagnosis and treatment of tobacco-related disease.

Rob Cunningham, lawyer for the CCS and Senior Policy Analyst states, “The approach in the proposed settlement falls massively short and fails to protect the future health of Canadians properly. How can such an approach possibly be justified when we continue to have millions of Canadians who smoke each year and tobacco remains the leading cause of cancer death? This settlement fails to support public health efforts to reduce smoking.”

Cunningham is supportive of the $1 billion funding, which will go towards the foundation independent of the government but expressed concerns that it will not be involved in proactive measures such as: smoking cessation initiatives, awareness campaigns, or public health programs.

Cunningham would like to see specific changes before approval. He notes, “The foundation must have the ability to fund a full range of initiatives to reduce tobacco use, such as smoking cessation and community programs, among others. Moreover, as in the U.S, the settlement in Canada should contain policy measures to reduce tobacco use such as banning remaining tobacco promotion and should require public disclosure of secret tobacco company internal documents.”

Some of the data presented by Canada Cancer Society include:

  • Smoking is the leading cause of disease and death in Canada with 16,000 deaths in Ontario and 46,000 in Canada
  • The rate of smoking is 11.4% for age 18 and older according to 2023 stats
  • About 3.6 million Canadians are smokers

The Canada Cancer Society highlights some of the wrongful actions of the tobacco industry such as:

  • Marketing to underage teenagers
  • Advertising to women with themes of slimness and fashion
  • Denying that smoking caused cancer and other diseases
  • Failing to warn consumers adequately
  • Using misleading advertising, including for so-called “light” and “mild” cigarettes
  • Lobbying aggressively against tobacco control laws

Cunningham states, “Without investing in significant measures to reduce tobacco use, this proposed settlement misses the very intention of the lawsuits in the first place, which is to curtail the damages caused by the tobacco industry. The health disaster caused by the tobacco industry is still ongoing and needs immediate attention, which this proposed settlement fails to do. This is a deal that won’t reduce smoking.”

The three major tobacco companies in Canada include:

  • Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd. (owned by British American Tobacco)
  • Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. (owned by Philip Morris International)
  • JTI-Macdonald Corp (owned by Japan Tobacco)

Gar Mahood of the Campaign for Justice on Tobacco Fraud acknowledged the settlement is a “Hollow victory. The settlement went from $500 billion in claimed damages (the costs to the health care system for treating smoking-related illness) to just over $24.7 billion. It’s a financial cave-in that will be paid for by current addicted smokers, the most at-risk group in the proposed settlement, and youth who will become addicted.”

“It is a meaningful first step in acknowledging decades of harm,” states Jessica Buckley, President and CEO at the Lung Health Foundation (LHF) notes further, “But financial restitution can’t make up for the loss of life. It can’t make up for the experiences of Canadians who have suffered through lung cancer and COPD. It’s not enough for people who are struggling to breathe right now.”

“It is crucial to ensure that more resources are allocated to lung health prevention programs, research and education efforts.

She is not sure if the funds will go directly into practical steps. “LHF is pushing fit a Smoke-Free Generation, a move that if enacted, would protect youth from addiction by ensuring that youth born after a certain date would never legally become of age to purchase tobacco products.”

Jacob Shelley, co-director of the Health Ethics, Law and Policy lab at Western University shares that he is pleased that plaintiffs will receive restitution after five years of going through the courts. He states, “It’s not a meaningful individual victory in the sense of like a big payout, but it’s meaningful and there is going to be an opportunity for collection on this claim, which started decades ago, and that there is recognition and an imposition of liability for the failure to warn about the risks associated with the use of this product.”

Continue Reading

Community News

The world says goodbye to the Calypso Lion, Dennis James Sr

Published

on

Photo credit - Dennis James Web Page

BY MICHAEL THOMAS

Three-time Canadian Calypso monarch and Saint Lucian-born Mr. Dennis James Sr. has left us. Uncle Dennis as would sometimes call him was an extremely passionate performer. Anyone who attended a Calypso tent where Dennis James sang could testify to this. He was a reticent brother by nature but make no mistake when he hit the stage you knew it was showtime.

Always dressed to the teeth, Dennis left no stone unturned musically. He was not just a Calypso singer, Dennis touched almost every genre musically from: Soca, Calypso to RnB, and more. Every song Dennis James did he brought his fiery touch to it like a stamp.

James was crowned Canadian Calypso monarch first in 2001, then 2002, and 2006. From the day James touched down in Toronto to perform as a Calypso artist, he was loved. Some artists have to grow into that love, the audience gave Dennis that package naturally.

With songs like “West Indians Unite,” “Words I Did Not Say,” “Nothing to Declare,”  “The Thunder,” and “Thank You Toronto,” it is said that as a Calypso artist, if you knew you were competing against Dennis James, you better do your homework.

One of the founding members of the Calypso organization here in Toronto and artist Juno D Kanhai aka Juno D’ Lord remembers Dennis James in two words as a “Great crooner.”

Seven-time Canadian Calypso monarch Tara Woods (aka Macoomere-Fifi) told me, “I called him Mr. Toronto. From the time Dennis James landed in Toronto, he was loved by everyone. He was always grateful for the love, and very shy about his talent.”

“Dennis may have looked unassuming, that is until he hit the stage. I will always remember Dennis onstage with that smile that is all his own, and the vocal explosion when he feels the audience’s love.”

“You had to be afraid,” she said. “Dennis was one of the guys you had to watch as a competitor. You could not take him lightly. He has left us a legacy. Rest in peace Mr. T.O.”

I spoke to five-time Canadian Calypso monarch Bryan Thornhill (aka “Structure”) who competed against Dennis in the Calypso arena, “I first met Dennis in 2003 in the Calypso finals. Even though we were fierce competitors we had that admiration for each other’s work. His strong voice and renditions made him a formidable force and added color to the Kaiso mosaic. My deepest condolences to his family. He will always be remembered. May he Rest in Peace!”

Calypso Monarch and Soca king Joel Davis (aka “Connector”) had this to say of James. “He was a giant in the business, a humble but serious man who I considered a cultural ambassador. He executed his vocal range with a vengeance.”

Five-time Canadian Calypso monarch Michael Moore (aka the Lord Beginner) also weighed in on his memory of Dennis James. “What I liked about him was his aggressive nature on stage. Even though we performed in the same tent I told myself, I better watch him. James was smooth, Dennis performed nicely, and he knew how to get the crowd involved in the Calypso. He was a fierce competitor, and I liked him, but you know me, even though we were in the same camp I have no friends when it came to the competition, but I am very sympathetic about his passing.”

One of the things I have learned as an artist from Dennis is to document my work. James would post songs that he recorded in the 70s as well as his latest work, both his music and the pictures from that era he kept. Not many artists have that mindset.

Even though James has lived in the US and Canada he has never forgotten his Saint Lucian roots going back from time to time and even competing in the Island’s national Calypso competition.

I have always liked how Dennis James packaged and presented himself as an artist. He took his craft seriously and I respect that. On behalf of the Toronto Calypso fraternity, I extend condolences to his wife and family. Dennis James, may you fly high King. You will be fondly remembered.

Continue Reading

Trending