Connect with us

Community News

The EV Agenda – Any transformative agenda that promotes the abolition of individual ownership should be rejected

Published

on

BY SIMONE J. SMITH

“You’ll own nothing. And you’ll be happy.”

Only a few years ago, The Great Reset was dismissed and labelled a conspiracy theory. Now, terms like: “The Great Reset,” and “New World Order’ are widely used by governments, world leaders and influential individuals.

“Blah, blah, blah. Here we go again!” I get that everything else that is going on in your life might be taking precedence, but I want to be clear; the Great Reset will affect your life, so it’s important to understand it, so you can make the right decisions for you and your family.

On the surface, it may seem chaotic and random, but behind world events are a core group of people driving the global changes we are experiencing. As your community media source, it is our job to not only connect the dots, but to provide you with enough information so that you can take action now. Are you ready? Let’s get into it.

The quote that I started this article with is something that was actually said; now, it can be viewed as a prediction, and is based on just one of eight made by the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) network of Global Future Councils. As this quote went viral, “the prediction” roused suspicion about the WEF’s intentions for many of us.

Things really became apparent after the WEF announced its ‘Great Reset’ agenda to the world in June 2020 (Schwab, 2020), and the reaction to the prediction became stronger and louder. COVID-19 was identified as the principal reason for pursuing the agenda, but the WEF claimed that it also addressed “The climate and social crises,” emerging even before the pandemic’s onset (Schwab, 2020). Now, the prediction was being characterized as an actual ‘goal’ of the WEF.

Naturally, in order to present you with quantifiable knowledge, I searched the internet to find information that discussed this very topic. I stumbled up, A future with no individual ownership is not a happy one: Property theory shows why (September 2023), and found a research study that examines the prediction from a property perspective. The authors state that, “By assuring access to the things to which humans relate, property ownership can support personhood, the realization of which is, we contend, a threshold requirement for human happiness.”

They argue that contrary to the WEF prediction, an owner-less future would not be a happy one for individuals. Ownership should thus be preserved as a property concept and they offer an aspiration for it that better supports not just human happiness, but also a more socially just, sustainable, and emancipatory future.

center>

They are slowly stripping away our sustainable, and emancipatory future, and they are bombarding us with distractions, and creating chaos in order to do so without resistance. Today we are going to speak on something that is in mainstream media, but has not been highlighted, or pieced together like I am going to do for you.

The End of the Gas Vehicle

The end of the road is coming for gas-powered vehicles in Canada as Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault finalizes new regulations mandating the transition to battery-operated cars, trucks and SUVs.

Automakers will have the next 12 years to phase out: combustion engine cars, trucks and SUVs, with a requirement to gradually increase the proportion of electric models they offer for sale each year.

Their claim is that this move fulfills a promise made by the Liberals more than two years ago to phase out the sale of combustion engine passenger vehicles by 2035 (Agenda 2030). It was applauded by multiple environment groups in early December 2023. Banning gas-powered cars by 2035 isn’t a particularly original thought: Japan, Chile, China, South Korea, the U.K. and others have already pledged to ban or severely restrict EV sales by 2035. This could almost be looked at like a “World Order,” couldn’t it?

It was also announced that production of Chrysler 300, Dodge Charger, and Dodge Challenger at plants across Ontario would be ending in 2024, and the factory will begin retooling and modernizing toward the company’s electric vehicle future. The move comes after a $3.6-billion investment for upgrades to both plants, announced last month.

During the announcement, the automaker said it hopes to diversify its ability to introduce battery-electric, or hybrid models to the production line at the Windsor Assembly Plant. The province is funding up to $287 million with this renovation.

Honda is also looking at several potential sites, including next to an existing automobile factory in the province of Ontario. It expects to decide by the end of 2024, with the new facility to go onstream as early as 2028. Honda already has plans to make EVs and batteries in the U.S. state of Ohio starting in 2026, so the proposed Canadian EV plant, if it goes online, will become its second in North America.

To encourage the switch to EVs, the U.S. government is offering tax breaks of up to $7,500 to buyers of EVs. For an EV to be eligible, it needs to meet certain requirements such as being assembled in North America and sourcing batteries from approved regions.

The Government of Canada knows that the higher upfront purchase cost of zero-emission vehicles (ZEVs) can make it more difficult to adopt this clean technology. So, what do they do?  They come with an incentives program (Zero-Emission Vehicles, or iZEV) to help make buying an EV more affordable.

The iZEV Program offers point-of-sale incentives for consumers (subject to funding availability) who buy or lease a ZEV vehicle. Only the vehicles listed on the Government of Canada website are eligible for an incentive when they’re purchased or leased for at least 12 months, on or after the eligibility date.

According to Bloomberg, gas-powered models sold before 2035 will remain on the roads for many years after that, but no additional ones will be added. In 2023, about one in 10 new vehicles registered were electric, suggesting EV sales need to double within the next three years (have to stay online with the agenda). They already doubled in the last three years, growing from 38,425 EVs sold in the first nine months of 2020 to 132,783 in the first nine months of 2023.

The United States is pushing electric vehicle adoption federally with an emissions policy that will require more EVs to be sold so that overall emissions go down (getting rid of gas cars). The Federal Liberals in Canada, however, note that 10 states have EV sales mandates similar to Canada’s, including California. By 2027, they say, 40% of the North American auto market will be covered by a mandate like Canada’s.

This seems like a great, noble cause. Trying to address global issues and create positive global change for the world.

So, what’s the problem?

There are a few things to consider.

I want you to think about it, in just 13 years it will become illegal to purchase a new car, or truck powered by gasoline or diesel. The idea, of course, is to curb Canadian emissions by dramatically decreasing consumer demand for motor fuel. While electric vehicles (EVs) have gained popularity and attention for their environmental benefits and lower operating costs, there are some lesser-discussed issues and challenges associated with them.

First of all, the manufacturing process for batteries, especially lithium-ion batteries, involves mining and processing raw materials. This can have environmental and social impacts, including habitat destruction, water pollution, and concerns about labor practices in mining regions. The environmental benefits of electric vehicles depend on the energy sources used to generate electricity. If the electricity used for charging primarily comes from fossil fuels, the overall environmental impact may be less positive. The transition to renewable energy sources is crucial to maximize the environmental benefits of EVs.

Then there are the electric vehicle components, including batteries, which pose challenges in terms of disposal and recycling. Developing effective recycling processes for lithium-ion batteries is essential to minimize the environmental impact of e-waste from electric vehicles. While recycling efforts are underway, the industry is still working on efficient and cost-effective ways to recycle and repurpose used electric vehicle batteries. Finding sustainable solutions for end-of-life batteries is crucial to minimize environmental impact.

So, pretty phasing in EV’s (which are supposed to help with climate change), are actually going to be destroying our environment, the very environment that we are supposed to be saving.

Hmmmm!

Remember, the quote that we started with, “You’ll own nothing. And you’ll be happy.” Life is already a financial struggle for people, and we’re actually in the midst of a historically steep spike in the price of used cars. COVID-related supply chain shortages (most notably semiconductors) have slowed down the production of vehicles so sharply that if you own a 2018 car with fewer than 100,000 kilometers, you can probably flip it at close to 85%  of the sticker price. Normally, you’d be lucky to get 50%. Really! Who is even going to be able to afford a car, oh yes! I forgot, they are establishing 15-minute cities that will have less parking spaces, and everything is 15 minutes away, so you won’t need a car.

“You’ll own nothing. And you’ll be happy.”

All of this has been decided by governments and independent people all in the name of your safety and protecting the environment. All under the direction to “trust the science” and “trust the experts” and “trust the data” without ever seeing the science or meeting the experts or reading the data.

Before you go putting blind faith in the World Economic Foundation, I want you to know that they are not here working for the people; they are working for themselves. To end this article, I want to break this down. The WEF is a private organization created and funded by wealthy individuals and companies. Membership is limited to those who can afford it (this is not any of us unfortunately). Members and representatives are not elected, they are chosen, and have been chosen for years).

They are a central, global organization trying to impose their world views and their agendas on individual governments, and all of us. Many of these people and organizations have conflicting interests and agendas that may benefit from certain actions and recommendations of the WEF. Members include large national and multinational corporations whose action, or inaction can impact governments and entire nations and economies and could be used to induce governments to: do certain things, introduce certain legislations, or take certain actions.

Any transformative agenda that promotes the abolition of individual ownership should be rejected on account of its failure to properly take account not only for human happiness, but of the human condition more generally.

We, as humans are guaranteed certain things in life: stressors, taxes, bills and death are the first thoughts that pop to mind. It is not uncommon that many people find a hard time dealing with these daily life stressors, and at times will find themselves losing control over their lives. Simone Jennifer Smith’s great passion is using the gifts that have been given to her, to help educate her clients on how to live meaningful lives. The Hear to Help Team consists of powerfully motivated individuals, who like Simone, see that there is a need in this world; a need for real connection. As the founder and Director of Hear 2 Help, Simone leads a team that goes out into the community day to day, servicing families with their educational, legal and mental health needs.Her dedication shows in her Toronto Caribbean newspaper articles, and in her role as a host on the TCN TV Network.

Community News

“We want 9-8-8 to become as familiar as dialing 9-1-1,” 9-8-8 Celebrates one year serving the community

Published

on

BY SIMONE J. SMITH

The holiday season, a time often associated with joy and celebration, can paradoxically trigger a decline in mental well-being for many. Coupled with the ongoing pressures of inflation, rising crime rates, and the abrupt shift of daylight savings time, particularly in northern regions, these factors can create a perfect storm for individuals struggling with their mental health.

Suicide, a tragic reality, knows no boundaries, impacting people of all ages and backgrounds. In Canada alone, a staggering average of 4,500 lives are lost to suicide each year, translating to approximately 12 individuals per day. The impact of each suicide extends far beyond the individual, leaving a trail of grief and devastation among family, friends, and communities.

On November 30th, 2023, Canada launched 9-8-8 Suicide Crisis Helpline. It is for anyone thinking about suicide, feeling hopeless, or like they are struggling to cope. The Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH) in Toronto, Canada’s largest mental health teaching hospital, leads and coordinates delivery of 9-8-8 nationwide. 9-8-8 is funded by the Government of Canada, through the Public Health Agency of Canada.

A growing network of nearly 40 experienced local and national crisis line partners across the country provide culturally appropriate, lifesaving supports to people who call or text the helpline.

Over the past year, 9-8-8 crisis responders have answered more than 300,000 calls and texts to the national helpline. 9-8-8 answers an average of almost 30,000 calls and texts per month – approximately 1,000 calls and texts per day. In Ontario, 9-8-8 responders answer an average of over 12,000 calls and texts per month (more than 135,000 from the launch to October 31st, 2024).

The goal of the three-digit helpline is to prevent suicide by making it as simple as possible for people to get the help they need, when they need it most. 9-8-8 provides urgent, live support by phone and text to people in every province and territory across the country in English and French, 24/7, every day of the year.

Last week, I had a chance to speak with Nika Khossravi, 9-8-8 Crisis Responder, and she shared with me her reason for becoming a responder, and the importance of 9-8-8.

“Last year I experienced the loss of a friend to suicide,” Nika shares, “When I was grieving the loss, I did a lot of reflection, and I realized that I did not have the tools to assist my friend. I dug deep and volunteered and learned a lot. What many of us don’t take into consideration is how suicide affects survivors of suicide. We don’t like to say suicide is contagious, but sometimes it becomes more of a reality, especially when someone close to you has committed suicide.”

What are the biggest challenges you anticipate in ensuring equitable access to the 9-8-8 helpline for all Canadians, including those in remote, rural, and underserved communities,” I inquired?

“It serves every single city in Canada. It is the same as 9-1-1. Let’s be honest, when you are in crisis, you are not thinking about long drawn-out numbers. We want 9-8-8 to become as familiar as dialing 9-1-1,”

“Are there mechanisms for seamless referrals and follow-up care?”

“Responders offer follow calls within 24 hours, and some are able to do referrals to local distress centres. 211 is one of the resource databases that we can provide for them.”

9-8-8 also offers support and advice for people who are worried someone they know may be considering suicide. Whatever you are going through, you don’t have to face your problems on your own. 9-8-8 responders are here to listen. No one who calls or texts 9-8-8 will be turned away. Everyone who contacts 9-8-8 will be assessed for suicide risk.

“What are the initial expectations and long-term goals for the 9-8-8 helpline in terms of reducing suicide rates and improving mental health outcomes for Canadians?”

“We want people to be aware. We are a resource to those who think someone in their lives might be thinking about suicide. We want 9-8-8 to be as familiar to Canadians as 9-1-1.”

By texting or calling 9-8-8, people can connect with a responder who’s ready to
listen and trained to help. 9-8-8 responders work with callers and texters to explore ways to cope when things are overwhelming and find a path to safety. Responder training is informed by evidence, best practices and engagement with organizations representing populations most affected by suicide to ensure that anyone, anywhere, can access the support they need.

For more information and to receive the latest updates, please visit www.988.ca  or connect with them on our social media platforms:
Twitter: @988Canada
Facebook: 988Canada
Instagram: @988Canada
LinkedIn: 988Canada

Continue Reading

Community News

The health disaster caused by the tobacco industry is still ongoing and needs immediate attention

Published

on

BY PAUL JUNOR

The announced lawsuit seeking $500 billion against the tobacco companies could potentially be settled. The Canadian Cancer Society (CCS) issued a press release on October 18th, 2024, in which it expressed reservations. The Ontario government is supportive, but there have been mixed reactions from others.

The proposed lawsuit would dispense the following:

  • $24.7 billion over time to provinces and territories, including $6.3 billion up front, and the remainder paid out as a percentage of tobacco company profits, including 85% of net after-tax profits in the first five years, and then 80% declining to 70% in subsequent years, until the $24.7 billion is paid
  • $4.1 billion to the Quebec class action plaintiffs
  • $2.5 billion to individual victims across Canada beyond the Quebec class action plaintiffs
  • $1.0 billion to a Foundation to fund research for the diagnosis and treatment of tobacco-related disease.

Rob Cunningham, lawyer for the CCS and Senior Policy Analyst states, “The approach in the proposed settlement falls massively short and fails to protect the future health of Canadians properly. How can such an approach possibly be justified when we continue to have millions of Canadians who smoke each year and tobacco remains the leading cause of cancer death? This settlement fails to support public health efforts to reduce smoking.”

Cunningham is supportive of the $1 billion funding, which will go towards the foundation independent of the government but expressed concerns that it will not be involved in proactive measures such as: smoking cessation initiatives, awareness campaigns, or public health programs.

Cunningham would like to see specific changes before approval. He notes, “The foundation must have the ability to fund a full range of initiatives to reduce tobacco use, such as smoking cessation and community programs, among others. Moreover, as in the U.S, the settlement in Canada should contain policy measures to reduce tobacco use such as banning remaining tobacco promotion and should require public disclosure of secret tobacco company internal documents.”

Some of the data presented by Canada Cancer Society include:

  • Smoking is the leading cause of disease and death in Canada with 16,000 deaths in Ontario and 46,000 in Canada
  • The rate of smoking is 11.4% for age 18 and older according to 2023 stats
  • About 3.6 million Canadians are smokers

The Canada Cancer Society highlights some of the wrongful actions of the tobacco industry such as:

  • Marketing to underage teenagers
  • Advertising to women with themes of slimness and fashion
  • Denying that smoking caused cancer and other diseases
  • Failing to warn consumers adequately
  • Using misleading advertising, including for so-called “light” and “mild” cigarettes
  • Lobbying aggressively against tobacco control laws

Cunningham states, “Without investing in significant measures to reduce tobacco use, this proposed settlement misses the very intention of the lawsuits in the first place, which is to curtail the damages caused by the tobacco industry. The health disaster caused by the tobacco industry is still ongoing and needs immediate attention, which this proposed settlement fails to do. This is a deal that won’t reduce smoking.”

The three major tobacco companies in Canada include:

  • Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd. (owned by British American Tobacco)
  • Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. (owned by Philip Morris International)
  • JTI-Macdonald Corp (owned by Japan Tobacco)

Gar Mahood of the Campaign for Justice on Tobacco Fraud acknowledged the settlement is a “Hollow victory. The settlement went from $500 billion in claimed damages (the costs to the health care system for treating smoking-related illness) to just over $24.7 billion. It’s a financial cave-in that will be paid for by current addicted smokers, the most at-risk group in the proposed settlement, and youth who will become addicted.”

“It is a meaningful first step in acknowledging decades of harm,” states Jessica Buckley, President and CEO at the Lung Health Foundation (LHF) notes further, “But financial restitution can’t make up for the loss of life. It can’t make up for the experiences of Canadians who have suffered through lung cancer and COPD. It’s not enough for people who are struggling to breathe right now.”

“It is crucial to ensure that more resources are allocated to lung health prevention programs, research and education efforts.

She is not sure if the funds will go directly into practical steps. “LHF is pushing fit a Smoke-Free Generation, a move that if enacted, would protect youth from addiction by ensuring that youth born after a certain date would never legally become of age to purchase tobacco products.”

Jacob Shelley, co-director of the Health Ethics, Law and Policy lab at Western University shares that he is pleased that plaintiffs will receive restitution after five years of going through the courts. He states, “It’s not a meaningful individual victory in the sense of like a big payout, but it’s meaningful and there is going to be an opportunity for collection on this claim, which started decades ago, and that there is recognition and an imposition of liability for the failure to warn about the risks associated with the use of this product.”

Continue Reading

Community News

The world says goodbye to the Calypso Lion, Dennis James Sr

Published

on

Photo credit - Dennis James Web Page

BY MICHAEL THOMAS

Three-time Canadian Calypso monarch and Saint Lucian-born Mr. Dennis James Sr. has left us. Uncle Dennis as would sometimes call him was an extremely passionate performer. Anyone who attended a Calypso tent where Dennis James sang could testify to this. He was a reticent brother by nature but make no mistake when he hit the stage you knew it was showtime.

Always dressed to the teeth, Dennis left no stone unturned musically. He was not just a Calypso singer, Dennis touched almost every genre musically from: Soca, Calypso to RnB, and more. Every song Dennis James did he brought his fiery touch to it like a stamp.

James was crowned Canadian Calypso monarch first in 2001, then 2002, and 2006. From the day James touched down in Toronto to perform as a Calypso artist, he was loved. Some artists have to grow into that love, the audience gave Dennis that package naturally.

With songs like “West Indians Unite,” “Words I Did Not Say,” “Nothing to Declare,”  “The Thunder,” and “Thank You Toronto,” it is said that as a Calypso artist, if you knew you were competing against Dennis James, you better do your homework.

One of the founding members of the Calypso organization here in Toronto and artist Juno D Kanhai aka Juno D’ Lord remembers Dennis James in two words as a “Great crooner.”

Seven-time Canadian Calypso monarch Tara Woods (aka Macoomere-Fifi) told me, “I called him Mr. Toronto. From the time Dennis James landed in Toronto, he was loved by everyone. He was always grateful for the love, and very shy about his talent.”

“Dennis may have looked unassuming, that is until he hit the stage. I will always remember Dennis onstage with that smile that is all his own, and the vocal explosion when he feels the audience’s love.”

“You had to be afraid,” she said. “Dennis was one of the guys you had to watch as a competitor. You could not take him lightly. He has left us a legacy. Rest in peace Mr. T.O.”

I spoke to five-time Canadian Calypso monarch Bryan Thornhill (aka “Structure”) who competed against Dennis in the Calypso arena, “I first met Dennis in 2003 in the Calypso finals. Even though we were fierce competitors we had that admiration for each other’s work. His strong voice and renditions made him a formidable force and added color to the Kaiso mosaic. My deepest condolences to his family. He will always be remembered. May he Rest in Peace!”

Calypso Monarch and Soca king Joel Davis (aka “Connector”) had this to say of James. “He was a giant in the business, a humble but serious man who I considered a cultural ambassador. He executed his vocal range with a vengeance.”

Five-time Canadian Calypso monarch Michael Moore (aka the Lord Beginner) also weighed in on his memory of Dennis James. “What I liked about him was his aggressive nature on stage. Even though we performed in the same tent I told myself, I better watch him. James was smooth, Dennis performed nicely, and he knew how to get the crowd involved in the Calypso. He was a fierce competitor, and I liked him, but you know me, even though we were in the same camp I have no friends when it came to the competition, but I am very sympathetic about his passing.”

One of the things I have learned as an artist from Dennis is to document my work. James would post songs that he recorded in the 70s as well as his latest work, both his music and the pictures from that era he kept. Not many artists have that mindset.

Even though James has lived in the US and Canada he has never forgotten his Saint Lucian roots going back from time to time and even competing in the Island’s national Calypso competition.

I have always liked how Dennis James packaged and presented himself as an artist. He took his craft seriously and I respect that. On behalf of the Toronto Calypso fraternity, I extend condolences to his wife and family. Dennis James, may you fly high King. You will be fondly remembered.

Continue Reading

Trending