Connect with us

Subscribe

Subscribe

News & Views

What are the top foods you should be avoiding? Unfortunately, we don’t know what to believe anymore

BY MICHAEL THOMAS

Nina Teicholz, who holds a Ph.D. and is a science journalist and author, calls the 421-page scientific report for the 2025 U.S. Dietary Guidelines “Insufficient and contradictory.” 

These are strong words, but after examining some of the dietary guidelines I am afraid she is correct, and anyone who cares about their health from a dietary point of view would agree.

Here are some of the key recommendations in this report.

  • Reducing red and processed meats.
  • Replacing poultry, meat, and eggs with peas, beans, and lentils as protein sources.
  • No limits on ultra-processed foods, or UPFs.
  • Continued caps on saturated fats are to be replaced by vegetable (seed) oils.

Despite pressure from people like Robert F. Kennedy Jr., to quit serving junk foods (aka ultra-processed foods- UPFs), the so-called expert committee responsible for the report insisted that the evidence for urging reductions in UPFs was “limited.” Translation, according to these experts, junk foods are good for children.

To add insult to injury, nine out of the 20 members who made these recommendations were found to have ties with: food, pharmaceutical, or weight loss companies, or industry groups with a stake in the outcome of the guidelines. This information was revealed thanks to a report by the non-profit public interest group, U.S. Right to Know.

The Right to Know makes it clear that the aim in calling out this scam of a recommendation, is to provide fuller disclosure of conflicts of interest of the members of the 2025 Dangerous Goods Advisory Council (aka DGAC), including: financial and other ties during the last five years to the: food, pharmaceutical, grocery, and other industries with a stake in the outcome of the dietary guidelines.

The 35-page report accuses the: food, beverage, and pharmaceutical companies, as well as large grocery chains with a financial stake in the DGA, of repeatedly attempting and often succeeding in influencing the guidelines.

What could these Dietary Guidelines folks be thinking by allowing themselves to become compromised on matters concerning the nation’s health? Could this be just a few cases of mismanagement by uncertified people, or is this just a satanic plot to maliciously misguide the population?

Doesn’t this so-called committee know that poor diet contributes to the development of many chronic diseases and illnesses, including: obesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, cancer, dementia, depression, chronic kidney disease, and all-cause mortality? This cannot be allowed to continue.

According to government data, “Americans have largely practiced the guidelines, and despite this, we have not only become sick, but very sick.”

Supporting this view is a congressionally mandated report by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, which observed in 2017 that, “The U.S. dietary guidelines are not currently ‘Trustworthy,’ in part due to a ‘Lack of scientific rigor’ in the process.”

When it came to producing evidence on its advice to reduce meat, poultry, and eggs, let’s just say this committee was weighed and found lacking. It is all good to tell folks they need to drop meat and dairy, but then what? This advice does not consider that plant-based proteins are not as complete as those from animals and also not as bioavailable. Anyone let alone any committee that encourages this without sound alternative nutritional backing does not have the people’s best health interest at heart.

After being called out on their misleading advice and faulty recommendations, U.S. Departments of Agriculture (aka USDA) and Health and Human Service (aka HHS) officials responded in classic gaslighting fashion stating that the critics are spreading misinformation.

Dr. Nina Teicholz had this to say of USDA-HHS and the involved parties, “I’m not a fan of the term ‘misinformation,’ but with respect to non-evidence-based dietary advice, the USDA-HHS are prominent actors.”

From looking at who is on the conflict-of-interest list involved, there are no surprises. Almost all the usual suspects are in attendance: Pfizer, Mead Johnson Pediatric Nutrition Institute, Nestlé Nutrition Institute, Rhythm Pharmaceuticals, WW International (formerly Weight Watchers International), just to name a few. These are just some of the folks that the people writing your “dietary guidelines” are in bed with.

If I were a betting man, I would say the plan is to mislead you with a faulty diet, then when you become sick, which eventually would happen, present the healing in the form of certain vaccines, but I digress.

Newsletter Signup

Stay in the loop with exclusive news, stories, and insights—delivered straight to your inbox. No fluff, just real content that matters. Sign up today!

Written By

In his new role as a reporter and Journalist, Michael can he be described in two words: brilliant, and relentless. Michael Thomas aka Redman was born in Grenada, and at an early age realized his love for music. He began his musical journey as a reggae performer with the street DJs and selectors. After he moved to Toronto in 1989, he started singing with the calypso tents, and in 2008, and 2009 he won the People’s Choice Award and the coveted title of Calypso Monarch. He has taken this same passion, and has begun to focus his attention on doing working within the community.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trending

PART 3 – Art Remains one of the last Unfiltered Voices of Defiance

News & Views

Embodying Peace: SAPACCY introduces AMANI: Mental Health & Substance Use Services for Black Youth

News & Views

PART 1 – Manufacturing Obedience; AI, The WEF & Agenda 2030—The Blueprint for Global Control

News & Views

Saint Lucia ignites the Canadian market with a high-energy tourism blitz

News & Views

Newsletter Signup

Stay in the loop with exclusive news, stories, and insights—delivered straight to your inbox. No fluff, just real content that matters. Sign up today!

Legal Disclaimer: The Toronto Caribbean Newspaper, its officers, and employees will not be held responsible for any loss, damages, or expenses resulting from advertisements, including, without limitation, claims or suits regarding liability, violation of privacy rights, copyright infringement, or plagiarism. Content Disclaimer: The statements, opinions, and viewpoints expressed by the writers are their own and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or views of Toronto Caribbean News Inc. Toronto Caribbean News Inc. assumes no responsibility or liability for claims, statements, opinions, or views, written or reported by its contributing writers, including product or service information that is advertised. Copyright © 2025 Toronto Caribbean News Inc.

Connect
Newsletter Signup

Stay in the loop with exclusive news, stories, and insights—delivered straight to your inbox. No fluff, just real content that matters. Sign up today!