Secrecy Over Transparency

In an age of information, Canada has chosen to hide its COVID-19 vaccine injury records from its citizens by sealing these files for fifteen years. This flies in the face of the Freedom of Information Act of Canada, and critics are calling this action by Health Canada a cover-up.

The sealed documents reportedly include adverse-event reports, medical assessments, internal reviews, and correspondence related to compensation claims filed following COVID-19 vaccination. Health Canada’s explanation is that the long‑term restriction is required to protect personal medical information and is consistent with federal privacy legislation.

Transparency groups agree that personal information should be protected but argue that a 15‑year blackout prevents Canadians from understanding how many claims were approved or denied, what criteria were used, and how federal officials made decisions.

Advocates are asking Health Canada to shorten the restriction period or release redacted versions of the documents that protect privacy while preserving meaningful information. However, Health Canada maintains that vaccine safety monitoring is ongoing and that serious adverse reactions remain rare. Officials emphasize that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks.

Let us examine how rare serious adverse reactions from these injections are. Before we even talk about adverse reaction let’s not forget that Pfizer stopped the animal testing on their COVID injections because all the animals died. Think about that.

How many Canadians took this COVID –19 Injection?

According to an Ipsos poll from two years ago, 58% of Canadians said they had already gotten the COVID-19 jab recently. Canadians over the age of 55 years (74%) are more likely to have already gotten the COVID-19 vaccine or intend to get one soon. This means that over half of the Canadian population is already the victims of an experiment carried out on them by their government and medical personnel.

COVID-19 injection adverse reaction reporting by gender in Canada

According to Stats from the Canadian government’s website, overall, most adverse event reports were from females (72.4%). The reporting rate for females was 75.9 reports per 100,000 doses administered, compared to 31.5 per 100,000 doses administered for males.

Governments and Big Pharma the world over told their population that the COVID-19 injections were safe and effective. Let’s have a look at the adverse reactions as reported by Stats Canada to determine if this is true: cardiac arrest, cardiac failure, heart attacks, acute respiratory distress syndrome, myocarditis/pericarditis1 (inflammation of the heart muscle and lining around the heart), blood clots, fetal growth restriction, spontaneous abortion, cerebrovascular accident (stroke – includes ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes), Bell’s Palsy1/facial paralysis, hemorrhage (bleeding).

Just in case anyone is wondering, death is also on this list of reported adverse effects of the COVID –19 injections, yet Health Canada called this SAFE and EFFECTIVE.

Next, we shall examine the enormous death toll here in Canada, especially of Canadian women.

Health Canada’s Own report titled, “Heart Health Facts Have Established That,” eight times as many women die from heart disease and stroke as from breast cancer. 40% of all Canadian women’s deaths are due to heart disease and stroke. A woman’s risk of death from heart disease increases four times after menopause. The rate of stroke also increases dramatically after menopause. Some women may have different symptoms than men, such as indigestion-like discomfort, vague chest pain, discomfort or pressure, nausea, or back pain. These symptoms occur more often in women than in men and should not be ignored.

It is important to know that 70% of women have similar symptoms of a heart attack as men, such as sudden, strong, crushing chest pain and shortness of breath.

Does it make sense for Health Canada to hide the injection reports from citizens of the Country? Citizens like these women, who would have taken the COVID shot because their jobs were tied to it, and are now experiencing heart problems and heart-related deaths? Do these women not deserve answers?

NIH and the National Library of Medicine concluded that Canadian women of Afro-Caribbean ethnicity have greater prevalence rates of stroke and hypertension. In short, there exists an excess burden of cardiovascular disease and associated risk factors in the ethnically diverse Canadian population, inclusive of women. Ethnically tailored prevention strategies are required to reduce these disparities, and more robust, inclusive clinical research in these groups is warranted.

Again, how is this research and prevention strategies possible when Health Canada is blocking the very same files these researchers need to investigate for comparisons?

How heart problems affect Canadian women

Women with heart failure have a six-times increased risk of atrial fibrillation (Afib), a 25% higher risk than men. 45% more women die from strokes than men in Canada, and because they live longer, more women live with the effects of a stroke. Women with heart valve disease have a three-times increased risk of Afib (50% higher risk than men).

According to the Canadian Women’s Heart Health Centre at the University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 24,000 Canadian women die of heart disease every year. These are women from all walks of life, including Canadian women of Afro-Caribbean ethnicity and community.

According to the Canadian Women’s Heart Health Centre, many people, and some medical practitioners, are still unaware that women have a higher rate of death from heart disease than men, that their symptoms are often different, and that they may require a different diagnostic approach. The result is that women don’t always get the most appropriate treatment because the severity of their illness is underestimated.

It is worth noting that according to Statistics Canada, life expectancy increased for the first time in three years in 2023 but remained below levels observed before the announcement of COVID-19. The share of Canadian adults reporting very good or excellent perceived health declined from 61.3% in 2020 to 52.2% in 2023, and no matter how the pie was sliced, women bore the brunt of the beating as opposed to men in the health department.

From 2021 to 2022, very good or excellent perceived health declined similarly among men (from 58.9% to 55.6%) and women (from 58.6% to 52.0%), and it further decreased in 2023 (to 53.9% for men and 50.5% for women). Gender differences in perceived health were largest among 35- to 49-year-olds; the proportion of women reporting very good or excellent health was 6 percentage points lower than that of men in 2023.

As the numbers and facts in this piece have shown, from experimental injections, covering up of adverse reactions by shelving crucial evidence for decades to come, to the sheer horror of the suffering and deaths incurred by the people, we must use this as a lesson. A lesson in taking control of our health decisions and what goes into our bodies.